NewsMacro'Morally Bankrupt': McConnell Breaks Silence to Slam Trump's 'Coddling' of Putin

'Morally Bankrupt': McConnell Breaks Silence to Slam Trump's 'Coddling' of Putin

Author: Alternet·

Key Takeaways

  • •Mitch McConnell ended his prolonged public silence on the Russia-Ukraine war by declaring that President Trump's efforts to negotiate an end to the conflict with Moscow are certain to fail and amount to coddling Vladimir Putin.
  • •McConnell chairs the Senate defense appropriations subcommittee, a role with direct oversight of federal defense spending that gives his criticism institutional weight and a procedural foothold in future Pentagon funding debates.
  • •In a Wall Street Journal op-ed, McConnell called Trump's assertion that Russia has been fine on Ukraine factually wrong, strategically naive, and morally bankrupt, citing Moscow's violation of an energy-related ceasefire.
  • •McConnell warned that threatening to withhold security and intelligence assistance from Ukraine could enable Russian battlefield gains and prolong the war rather than shorten it.
  • •McConnell criticized Trump's push to buy Russian diesel to lower fuel prices, arguing it would break with longstanding sanctions policy, do little to reduce pump prices, and rebuked envoy Steve Witkoff for describing Putin as a humanitarian.
'Morally Bankrupt': McConnell Breaks Silence to Slam Trump's 'Coddling' of Putin

Sen. Mitch McConnell has broken his prolonged silence on the Russia-Ukraine war, declaring that President Donald Trump's efforts to strike deals with Moscow and end the years-long conflict are "certain to fail" and accusing the president of "coddling" Russian leader Vladimir Putin.

As The Hill reported Monday morning, the former Senate Majority Leader had largely remained quiet on matters surrounding the war until now. Despite a recent months-long health episode that raised questions about his fitness for office, McConnell still chairs the Senate defense appropriations subcommittee, a post with direct oversight of federal defense spending that gives his criticism institutional weight, and he used that platform this week to push back against Trump's claim that Russia "has been fine on Ukraine" — even after Moscow violated the terms of an energy-related ceasefire.

"This is factually wrong, strategically naive and morally bankrupt," McConnell wrote in a new op-ed for the Wall Street Journal. "His obsequious accommodation of Russia, rewarding the aggressor with sanctions relief, won't persuade Mr. Putin to stop. History shows that such behavior emboldens Russia's autocrat, who sees it as weakness."

He added: "Threatening to withhold security and intelligence assistance or access to crucial satellite communications systems won't materially weaken Ukraine's will to defend itself, but it may allow Mr. Putin to make battlefield headway that had until now been out of reach. This could prolong the war, not shorten it."

McConnell also took aim at Trump's push to bring down soaring diesel prices by arranging to purchase fuel from Russia, notwithstanding the economic sanctions previously imposed on Moscow. Those sanctions have been a centerpiece of Western efforts to cut off the revenue Moscow relies on to finance its war, meaning any American purchase of Russian fuel would amount to a break with a policy Washington has maintained for years. The move has drawn widespread criticism across the political spectrum in Washington, and McConnell is far from the first Republican to object to it.

"When Russia's limited supply of diesel has changed hands, it will have done little to bring down prices at the pump," McConnell wrote, echoing the assessments of numerous industry experts and economists. "Russian victory would have far worse consequences for our economic and national security and our global influence than temporarily high diesel prices. He is an ally of [Chinese leader] Xi Jinping. He will continue to seize opportunities to weaken America — and Europe."

McConnell further responded to recent remarks by Trump's special diplomatic envoy, Steve Witkoff, who praised Putin as a "humanitarian." "If the president means what he says about ending the conflict, he should look to the wisdom of the American people, not naive businessmen who seem to think diplomacy entails fawning over adversaries," McConnell wrote. "Mr. Putin is many things, but he is no humanitarian."

Because his subcommittee drafts the Senate version of the Pentagon's annual funding bill, McConnell's arguments are positioned to resurface whenever defense spending next comes before the Senate, giving his objections a procedural foothold beyond the opinion pages.