Luke Burgis Interviews Patrick Collison on Aesthetics
Key Takeaways
- •Luke Burgis, author of Wanting, interviewed Stripe co-founder and CEO Patrick Collison about New Aesthetics at the Cluny Institute's conference.
- •Patrick Collison and economist Tyler Cowen previously co-authored a 2019 Atlantic essay calling for a new "science of progress" and launched the Fast Grants program in 2020 to quickly fund COVID-19 research.
- •Collison offered an alternative theory for the post-1971 stagnation debate, arguing that society "lost the sacred, so we can't have nice things."
- •The conversation addressed topics including whether culture is "stuck," whether beauty is objective, and the absence of any nameable artwork made with AI.
- •The YouTube version of the interview includes an introduction by Brian Eno, the musician and producer credited with coining the term "ambient music."

Luke Burgis, author of Wanting, said it was very fun talking with @patrickc — Stripe co-founder and CEO Patrick Collison — about New Aesthetics at the @ClunyInstitute’s conference last month.
The pairing comes with history: Collison and economist Tyler Cowen — Marginal REVOLUTION, where this post appears, is Cowen’s blog with Alex Tabarrok — have collaborated before, co-authoring a 2019 Atlantic essay calling for a new “science of progress” and launching the Fast Grants program in 2020 to quickly fund COVID-19 research. The “what happened in 1971” question raised later in the conversation refers to the long-running stagnation debate over why a range of economic and technological indicators shifted around that year, terrain Cowen helped popularize with his 2011 book The Great Stagnation.
They discussed:
- The origin story of the New Aesthetics grants, and why he and Tyler Cowen disagree on almost everything aesthetic (1:00)
- Why culture is “stuck,” including the idea that a 1926 Bauhaus building could pass for one from last year (2:30)
- Modernism’s explicit, stated mission to tear down beauty — “they weren’t hiding it” (3:30)
- Solzhenitsyn’s view that while goodness and truth can be faked, beauty “bears within it its own verification” (6:30)
- Whether beauty is objective, including the contrast between Toledo, Spain and Toledo, Ohio (7:30)
- Detroit’s roughly 25 rich years and the Detroit Institute of Arts, compared with Silicon Valley’s 50 years of wealth; “We could do the Silicon Valley art tour in a coffee break” (14:30)
- Whether Y Combinator was secretly modeled on the art atelier (18:30)
- The highest-leverage point for aesthetic renewal, which used to be churches, and what that role might be now (27:00)
- The sacred as an “endangered species,” and Patrick’s alternative theory of what happened in 1971: “we lost the sacred, so we can’t have nice things” (28:30)
- A question about Vatican II and technological stagnation, which Patrick declined to answer; Luke Burgis did not (34:30)
- “Can anyone name a work of art made with AI?” followed by silence (37:30)
- Why Germany is preeminent in music, literature, and philosophy, and why its food is so bad, described as “a demand-side problem” (41:30)
- “Biology is so ugly, man.” Physics is beautiful; biology is “a tower of hacks” (43:30)
- The “anti-beauty conspiracy” of the last century and the latent demand that remains to be unlocked (52:30)
- Patrick’s live reaction to beeswax art (56:30)
Luke Burgis included the link to the conversation and said the YouTube version includes a Brian Eno introduction; Eno is the musician and producer credited with coining the term “ambient music.”
The post Luke Burgis interviews Patrick Collison on aesthetics appeared first on Marginal REVOLUTION.