Former SEC and CFTC Regulators Warn U.S. Risks Losing Edge in $90 Trillion Perpetuals Market
Key Takeaways
- •Eleanor Terrett shared a warning from a bipartisan group of former SEC and CFTC regulators about risks to the U.S. derivatives market.
- •The officials cautioned that the U.S. risks losing its competitive edge in the $90 trillion perpetual contracts market.
- •Perpetual futures are predominantly traded on offshore venues because U.S. derivatives law provides no clear registration pathway for these products.
- •The CFTC has previously sought public input on how perpetual-style derivatives could fit within existing regulatory frameworks.
- •If the U.S. does not adapt, trading activity could shift toward jurisdictions with more favorable regulatory regimes.

Journalist Eleanor Terrett has drawn attention to a warning from a bipartisan group of former SEC and CFTC regulators concerning the U.S. derivatives market. The former officials caution that the United States risks losing its competitive edge in the $90 trillion perpetual contracts market as regulatory agencies weigh new approaches. Their guidance underscores the urgency for the CFTC to develop strategies for onshoring the perpetuals (perps) market — a step that could have significant implications for market dynamics. Terrett shared the warning on X: https://x.com/EleanorTerrett/status/2094484285428244866
The Key Development
Terrett's post emphasizes the need for prompt action from U.S. regulators to safeguard the nation's position in the lucrative perps market. As derivatives trading grows globally, robust regulatory frameworks are increasingly viewed as essential to maintaining investor confidence and market integrity. The guidance from these former officials could serve as a rallying point for discussion within regulatory circles, even as the broader crypto market reflects mixed signals and fluctuating momentum across various assets.
Perpetual futures — derivative contracts with no expiry date, settled through funding-rate mechanisms — originated in the crypto markets and are today predominantly traded on offshore venues outside direct U.S. regulatory oversight. Because U.S. derivatives law does not currently provide a clear registration pathway for such products, the bulk of this trading volume occurs abroad, which is the competitive gap the former regulators are highlighting.
What We Know
- Eleanor Terrett raised concerns about risks facing the U.S. derivatives market.
- The bipartisan group consists of former SEC and CFTC regulators.
- The officials stress the need for effective onshoring strategies for the perpetuals market.
- The U.S. derivatives market is valued at $90 trillion.
- The call to action aims to protect U.S. market competitiveness.
Market Pulse
The state of the derivatives market has become increasingly consequential as global trading volumes rise. Regulatory clarity could play a significant role in shaping how these markets evolve, and the focus on onshoring and regulatory adjustments may produce a more structured trading environment, influencing both institutional and retail participation. As discussions unfold, monitoring regulatory developments will be vital for stakeholders across the derivatives space.
The CFTC and SEC are the primary regulatory bodies overseeing derivatives trading in the United States. Their jurisdiction covers a wide range of financial instruments, including perpetual contracts, and the effectiveness of their regulations can substantially affect market dynamics and investor protection in an evolving financial landscape.
What Comes Next
Key developments to watch include regulatory feedback from the CFTC and SEC in response to these concerns. The CFTC has previously solicited public input on how perpetual-style derivatives might fit within existing regulatory frameworks, and potential policy adjustments could reshape the landscape for derivatives trading. If the U.S. fails to adapt, there is a risk of market fragmentation, with trading activity potentially shifting toward jurisdictions with more favorable regulatory regimes. Market participants will need to follow official communications closely.