Corporates Face Intensifying ESG Pressures as Progress Slows and Disclosure Rules Tighten in 2026
Key Takeaways
- •Nearly half of corporate sustainability leaders acknowledged significant room for improvement in 2026, an increase of more than ten percentage points from the prior year, despite over 90% reporting strategic progress.
- •Regulatory compliance was cited by 49% of corporates as a leading sustainability driver, while investor expectations doubled to 42% compared with a year earlier.
- •The Philippine SEC now requires publicly listed companies and large businesses to comply with PFRS S1 and S2, sustainability reporting standards aligned with international IFRS S1 and S2 frameworks.
- •Over 80% of Philippine executives surveyed reported that their organizations had already experienced operational disruption from climate-related events or weather disasters.
- •No executives surveyed reported cutting sustainability spending, and 92% indicated investment either held steady or increased over the past year despite broader economic uncertainty.

Corporate sustainability strategies remain firmly on boardroom agendas in 2026, but the pace of progress is decelerating. According to Morgan Stanley's Sustainable Signals: Corporates 2026 report, over 90% of sustainability leaders say their organizations are advancing on strategy, yet nearly half (47%) acknowledge significant room for improvement — an increase of more than ten percentage points compared with 2025.
The report also highlights shifting motivations behind sustainability efforts. Forty-nine percent of corporates now cite regulatory compliance as a leading driver, while 42% point to investor expectations — nearly double the figure from a year earlier. The findings underscore the growing influence of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) disclosure frameworks and heightened investor scrutiny, especially across Asia-Pacific markets where regulatory harmonization remains a work in progress. This regional fragmentation reflects a broader global pattern in which companies operating across multiple jurisdictions must navigate diverging requirements — from the EU's Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) to emerging frameworks in North America and Asia — even as international standard-setters push toward convergence.
Physical climate risks are increasingly viewed as imminent threats. Seventy-eight percent of sustainability leaders expect negative impacts on their businesses within five years, and 63% anticipate higher operational costs as a result. Transition risks are seen as equally urgent, with 81% expecting tangible effects on their operations. These concerns have accelerated the integration of sustainability into corporate governance: 62% of boards now hold direct responsibility for ESG oversight, up from 42% the previous year.
For Philippine companies, these global trends carry particular weight. The Philippines 2026 C-Suite State of Corporate Sustainability Report identifies climate-related disruption as the most widely cited operational concern among Philippine executives. More than 80% of respondents reported that their organizations had already experienced disruption from climate-related events or weather disasters, while over 70% expect climate disclosure requirements, new policies, and rising insurance costs to materially affect their operations within three years.
Investment in sustainability has tracked these concerns rather than retreating. None of the executives surveyed reported cutting sustainability spending over the past year, and 92% indicated that investment either held steady or increased despite broader economic uncertainty. Seventy-two percent of companies said they had stepped up energy-efficiency measures, and 75% were either already sourcing renewable energy or planned to do so within the year — operational actions rather than purely messaging exercises.
Regulatory compliance remains the single strongest catalyst for that investment, with nearly half of executives citing it as the primary reason for accelerating climate action.
Philippine corporates face increasingly stringent disclosure requirements under the Securities and Exchange Commission's (SEC) sustainability reporting guidelines, even as international investors demand more credible ESG narratives.
In 2026, the SEC raised those requirements further. Publicly listed companies and large businesses must now comply with new sustainability reporting standards — Philippine Financial Reporting Standards (PFRS) S1 and S2. These standards are aligned with the IFRS Sustainability Disclosure Standards (IFRS S1 and S2) issued by the International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB), placing Philippine reporting expectations within the same global framework increasingly adopted across major economies. The rules mandate clearer climate-related disclosures and, in the near future, independent verification of greenhouse gas data.
The SEC also adopted IFRS 18 through SEC Memorandum Circular No. 22, Series of 2026, incorporating it as PFRS 18. Although primarily an accounting standard, its practical implications extend directly into sustainability communications. IFRS 18 introduces tighter rules for management-defined performance measures — the non-standard metrics frequently used in corporate reports and investor presentations, including sustainability-linked figures. Companies must now define such measures clearly, reconcile them to official financial results, and subject them to the same level of explanatory rigor as audited numbers.
Beyond compliance, the broader challenge lies in positioning sustainability simultaneously as a risk management tool and a driver of value creation. The Reputation Management Association of the Philippines reinforced this dual imperative in a recent outlook, highlighting growing demand for evidence-based, performance-driven, and accountable sustainability communication.
Organizations that have moved away from treating sustainability reporting as an annual filing exercise — and instead integrated it into capital allocation, risk management, and stakeholder trust strategies — are seeing measurable returns. These benefits include lower capital costs as investors reward transparency, stronger credibility with international buyers and financiers who require reliable sustainability data, and greater protection against the reputational and legal risks associated with unsubstantiated claims.
Ultimately, every regulatory shift becomes a communication challenge. Boards must articulate sustainability governance to investors; management teams must define performance measures without inviting scrutiny they cannot substantiate; and brands must communicate climate and social commitments in language that regulators, media, and the public find credible. Companies that build reporting discipline and public narrative in tandem — ensuring that the data behind every sustainability claim and the way the story is told reinforce one another — are better positioned to protect trust, reputation, and access to capital.
ReVerb Brand Communications (ReVerb), a corporate reputation management and sustainability communications agency and part of the PAGEONE Group, assists corporates in translating complex disclosure requirements into stakeholder-focused communications. The agency helps businesses articulate their impact, engage with stakeholders, and build trust through purpose-driven messaging.