XRP Ledger Executive Explains Why RLUSD Cannot Replace XRP as Stablecoin Adoption Grows
Key Takeaways
- •Vet, an executive at the XRP Ledger Foundation, stated that RLUSD and XRP fulfill different roles and that stablecoin growth does not eliminate XRP's core functions.
- •Every XRP Ledger account must maintain an XRP reserve and pay transaction fees in XRP, requirements that RLUSD cannot replace.
- •Ripple can freeze RLUSD tokens under applicable United States regulations, whereas XRP has no central issuer with equivalent authority to freeze individual account balances.
- •RLUSD's price stability makes it practical for business payments such as payroll, invoices, and operating expenses, while XRP appeals to traders and liquidity providers who accept market volatility.
- •Binance began restoring withdrawals on November 1, initially prioritizing Bitcoin, Ethereum, and XRP before expanding to RLUSD, following an October 29 security breach associated with an estimated $6.3 billion in cryptocurrency theft.

XRP and Ripple's RLUSD stablecoin serve distinct purposes within the XRP Ledger, according to Vet, an executive at the XRP Ledger Foundation. While RLUSD offers the price stability that businesses and financial operations require, XRP remains integral to the network's transaction fees, account reserves, decentralized exchange infrastructure, and cross-asset liquidity.
In a post on X, Vet outlined the technical differences between the two assets, arguing that the growth of stablecoins does not eliminate XRP's underlying functions. The distinction centers on how each asset operates within the ledger and the different financial needs each one addresses. Stablecoins such as RLUSD are designed to track the value of a fiat currency, in this case the US dollar, a model that has made them a widely used payments tool across the crypto industry.
Why XRP Remains Essential to the XRP Ledger
Control is one of the main differences between the two assets. Ripple issues RLUSD under applicable United States regulations and can freeze tokens in certain circumstances, a form of issuer-level control commonly built into centralized, fiat-backed stablecoins. XRP, by contrast, has no central issuer with equivalent authority to freeze individual account balances.
As the ledger's native asset, XRP performs mandatory functions within the network. Every XRP Ledger account must maintain an XRP reserve, and users pay transaction fees in XRP. RLUSD does not replace these requirements, even as users increasingly adopt the stablecoin for payments and other financial activities.
The asset further occupies a distinct role in the XRP Ledger's decentralized exchange. According to Vet, the network can evaluate whether routing a transaction through XRP offers a better conversion rate than alternative paths. This functionality allows XRP to connect liquidity between different assets, including currencies that lack direct trading pairs.
By serving as a potential intermediary, XRP can help facilitate cross-currency transactions without requiring every asset pair to maintain its own direct market. That role is separate from the payment and settlement use cases associated with stablecoins.
RLUSD Offers Price Stability for Business Payments
RLUSD's defining advantage is price stability. Vet identified this characteristic as particularly useful for businesses managing payroll, invoices, and operating expenses, where predictable payment values can be more practical than assets subject to market fluctuations.
XRP, meanwhile, appeals to traders and liquidity providers who are prepared to accept cryptocurrency price volatility. Market makers can use XRP to move liquidity between different pools without relying entirely on centrally issued tokens, although they remain exposed to changes in XRP's market price.
The distinction also affects counterparty risk. Using XRP as an intermediary can reduce dependence on a centralized token issuer for certain liquidity-routing activities. That does not, however, remove the market risks associated with holding or trading XRP.
The two assets therefore address different requirements. RLUSD is designed to maintain a stable value relative to the US dollar, while XRP provides native network functionality and can serve as a bridge asset for transactions involving different currencies or tokens.
Binance Restores RLUSD Withdrawals After Reported Security Breach
Vet's comments came as Binance restored withdrawal services following a security breach on October 29. The incident was associated with an estimated $6.3 billion in cryptocurrency theft, according to the source material, and disrupted withdrawal services across several networks. Temporary withdrawal suspensions of this kind are a precaution exchanges commonly apply after security incidents while they assess the impact and secure their systems.
In a post on X, Binance announced that withdrawals were being restored.
Binance began restoring withdrawals on November 1, initially prioritizing major cryptocurrencies including Bitcoin, Ethereum, and XRP. The exchange subsequently expanded support to RLUSD and several other dollar-backed stablecoins.
The restoration of RLUSD withdrawals through Ethereum, one of the networks where the stablecoin circulates, allows Binance customers to transfer the stablecoin again following the temporary suspension. However, the expansion of RLUSD's availability on the exchange does not change XRP's required functions within the XRP Ledger itself.
XRP and RLUSD Serve Complementary Roles
Vet's explanation emphasizes that XRP and RLUSD are not direct substitutes across every use case. Businesses can favor RLUSD when price predictability is important, while XRP continues to support the ledger's reserve requirements, transaction fees, and liquidity-routing mechanisms.
Growing stablecoin adoption could contribute to activity across the XRP Ledger ecosystem without removing the need for its native asset. The two assets can support different financial applications while retaining distinct technical and economic characteristics.
The report was written by Marcus Renfield, a crypto market analyst and on-chain writer.
Source: Hokanews