NewsMacroStudy Finds Workplace Gossip Carries a Steeper Career Penalty for Men

Study Finds Workplace Gossip Carries a Steeper Career Penalty for Men

Author: Fortune Crypto·

Key Takeaways

  • •New research indicates men who gossip in the workplace receive lower competence ratings and are judged less fit for leadership roles than women who gossip.
  • •The conclusions are based on observations of 272 undergraduates in five-person teams plus two online experiments with approximately 450 U.S. workers.
  • •Researchers connect the gender gap to historical stereotypes associating gossip with women since the 16th century, making male gossip appear norm-violating.
  • •Although gossip can build trust and a sense of belonging, especially useful amid hybrid work and male loneliness, it carries a steeper career penalty for men.
  • •Business leaders Richard Branson, Ray Dalio, and Dave Ramsey have publicly opposed workplace gossip, with Ramsey making it one of his company's 14 core values and a reason for termination.
Study Finds Workplace Gossip Carries a Steeper Career Penalty for Men

Men who gossip around the office watercooler may hurt their chances of advancing up the corporate ladder, according to a study by researchers at the University of Iowa and the University of New Mexico.

The research found that men who gossip are perceived as less competent and less qualified for leadership roles than women who engage in the same behavior.

“Men when they engage in gossip, they tend to be judged a lot more harshly than women,” Trevor Spoelma, an associate professor of management and entrepreneurship at the University of Iowa’s Tippie College of Business, told Fortune.

The researchers reached their conclusions through three studies. The first involved observing 272 undergraduate students working in five-person teams on a class project. The researchers then conducted two online experiments involving roughly 450 U.S. workers. The study is available through Wiley Online Library.

Across the studies, people who gossiped received lower competence ratings. However, men faced a steeper penalty than women.

Gossip has existed as a social practice for centuries, but the word took on a more negative connotation around the 16th century, when it became increasingly associated with women spreading rumors. That history may help explain the gender double standard.

When men gossip about a third party, they may be seen as violating traditional expectations about how men should behave, Spoelma said. For women, the behavior may be viewed as more consistent with longstanding gender stereotypes.

Gossip can foster belonging, but men face a greater career penalty

Negative gossip can involve questioning a colleague’s abilities, criticizing their work, or sharing an unflattering story about them, Spoelma said. But gossip is not always malicious. It can also involve complimenting a colleague or sharing a harmless anecdote about someone who is not in the room.

In some cases, both forms of gossip can benefit employees by fostering trust and a sense of belonging.

“You’re suddenly in on something that supposedly not everyone’s in on. You become part of that inner circle,” psychologist Scott Lyons previously told Fortune. “You feel special. You feel like you matter.”

That sense of connection could be particularly valuable as hybrid work enables employees to collaborate less frequently face-to-face. Amid a broader loneliness crisis among men, informal workplace interactions can also offer another way to build meaningful relationships with colleagues.

However, while men tend to receive more leniency than women when their behavior violates social norms or is perceived as unusual, gossip appears to be an exception, Spoelma said.

“A lot of times, men receive a pass compared to women for different norm-violating behaviors,” he told Fortune. “But specifically, when it comes to gossip, that’s an instance where we see this penalty.”

Richard Branson and Ray Dalio oppose workplace gossip

Despite the social benefits some employees may find in gossip, several prominent business leaders have made clear that they do not believe it belongs in the workplace.

Richard Branson, the billionaire co-founder of Virgin Group, has long promoted avoiding speaking poorly about other people. In 2024, he told LinkedIn: “If I ever hear anybody gossiping, I will walk away because it’s just not good.”

“Everything comes back to people, people, people. ‘Are you good with people? Are you good at drawing out the best in people?’”

Ray Dalio, the billionaire founder of hedge fund Bridgewater Associates, has similarly said that talking about people behind their backs is counterproductive.

“You shouldn’t talk behind somebody’s back or gossip,” he said in a 2012 interview with the Academy of Achievement. “Too many people talk about the other people, what they’re doing wrong,” Dalio explained. “Except they don’t talk to those people about what they’re doing wrong. So they don’t know whether they’re actually doing them wrong or not. They haven’t heard the other side and they’re not being productive. So that’s terrible.”

Personal finance radio show host Dave Ramsey has gone further, making “No Gossip” one of the 14 values of his company, Ramsey Solutions.

“One of our core values is, I will fire you for being a gossip. I just did it and I’ll do it again,” Ramsey said on his EntreLeadership show in 2024.

Ramsey acknowledged that workplace disagreements and frustrations are inevitable, but said employees have a responsibility not to make them worse by spreading negativity among colleagues.

“You have one option at Ramsey. You must hand your negatives up to someone in leadership who can do something about it,” he said. “But if you hand your negatives down or sideways, that’s called gossip. I’ll warn you once maybe, but we’ll probably just fire you.”

This story was originally featured on Fortune.com.