NewsCryptoVitalik Buterin Says Hegotá Could Be Ethereum's Last 'Normal' Fork

Vitalik Buterin Says Hegotá Could Be Ethereum's Last 'Normal' Fork

Author: Cointelegraph·

Key Takeaways

  • •Vitalik Buterin said the Hegotá upgrade, planned for 2027, is likely Ethereum's final fork whose technology would still be recognizable to an observer from 2015.
  • •Future Ethereum development is expected to focus on recursive STARKs, automated formal verification, optimized consensus, and quantum-safe cryptography.
  • •Buterin cited PeerDAS, which lets nodes verify data availability by sampling rather than downloading everything, as the start of Ethereum's transition into a 'cryptographic world computer.'
  • •Ethereum researcher Barnabé Monnot argued that proving offchain computation onchain could lighten node workloads, but important application records should remain directly onchain so users can inspect and interact without intermediaries.
  • •Crypto lawyer Gabriel Shapiro questioned how much demand exists for proof-based architectures, noting many financial services still rely on reputation, regulation, and legal enforcement instead of continuous cryptographic verification.
Vitalik Buterin Says Hegotá Could Be Ethereum's Last 'Normal' Fork

Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin said the network's Hegotá upgrade could be its last "normal" fork before development shifts toward technologies that include recursive STARKs, automated formal verification, optimized consensus, and quantum-safe cryptography.

In a post published on his personal blog on Sunday, Buterin said Hegotá, which is planned for 2027, is likely to be the final upgrade whose features and technology would still be recognizable to someone familiar with Ethereum in 2015. He cited PeerDAS, which allows nodes to verify data availability by sampling portions of data rather than downloading everything, as marking the beginning of Ethereum's transition "from being just a blockchain to being something much more powerful."

Buterin described the transition as Ethereum's evolution into a "cryptographic world computer," moving beyond a model in which nodes simply download and re-execute transactions toward an architecture that combines blockchains with cryptographic verification, privacy, and decentralized offchain components. The shift could change how Ethereum applications are built by moving more computation offchain while using the base layer to verify results, settle transactions, and preserve access to shared onchain state.

That proposed architecture places the boundary between offchain computation and onchain records at the center of the design discussion. The network could reduce the work required from nodes by verifying proofs of results, while the treatment of application records and user interactions would determine how directly people can inspect and use those applications without relying on external services.

What Ethereum's 'world computer' could look like

Buterin's post prompted discussion over how much computation and state should ultimately move offchain, and what Ethereum itself should continue to handle directly as the network evolves.

Ethereum researcher Barnabé Monnot said on X that moving computation offchain while committing to and proving the results onchain could significantly reduce the work required from the network and enable lighter nodes. However, Monnot argued that a "world computer" should still keep important records that its applications depend on directly onchain. Doing so, he said, would let users see what is happening and interact with applications directly, without relying on external servers or intermediaries.

Pseudonymous commentator Cryptographic argued on X that the architecture could expand what decentralized finance (DeFi) applications can do by allowing more complex computation to occur outside smart contracts while Ethereum verifies that resulting transactions comply with protocol rules. Cryptographic cited DeFi lending as one example, where collateral analysis, liquidation routing, or matching borrowers and lenders could happen outside the chain before Ethereum verifies and settles the outcome.

Crypto lawyer Gabriel Shapiro questioned on X how much demand exists for proof-based systems compared with traditional trust-based models. He noted that many existing financial services rely on reputation, regulation, and legal enforcement rather than continuous cryptographic verification.