NewsCryptoUniswap, a16z and Paradigm Join Legal Fight Against Illinois' 0.2% Crypto Tax

Uniswap, a16z and Paradigm Join Legal Fight Against Illinois' 0.2% Crypto Tax

Author: CryptoNewsNet·

Key Takeaways

  • •Uniswap, Andreessen Horowitz, and Paradigm joined the DeFi Education Fund, Aave Labs, Chainlink Labs, and 14 other co-signers in filing an amicus brief supporting the Blockchain Association and Crypto Council for Innovation's court challenge to Illinois' Digital Asset Tax Act.
  • •The brief argues that Illinois' draft broker rules would require fee-charging decentralized exchanges and their interfaces to collect the 0.2% levy, with a16z policy chief Miles Jennings contending that autonomous software cannot perform that function.
  • •The U.S. Justice Department filed a statement of interest on Nov. 6 arguing the tax undermines federal digital asset policy, and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and SIFMA filed a separate brief the same day.
  • •The brief's signers opposed a draft provision that would require brokers to store customers' private keys, citing theft risks and proposing that public keys be required instead.
  • •Signed by Gov. JB Pritzker on June 16, 2026, the 0.2% tax covers qualifying digital asset exchanges, transfers, and storage services even without a sale or profit, and a court-approved agreement has pushed enforcement from January 1 to July 1, 2027.
Uniswap, a16z and Paradigm Join Legal Fight Against Illinois' 0.2% Crypto Tax

Uniswap, Andreessen Horowitz (a16z), and Paradigm have joined a coalition of decentralized finance groups backing a court challenge to Illinois' 0.2% digital asset tax. The coalition filed an amicus brief opposing the state's draft broker rules, arguing that the proposal would require fee-charging decentralized exchanges and their interfaces to collect the levy. An amicus brief allows non-parties to a case to file supporting arguments, and this filing broadens the dispute's backers beyond the trade associations that originally sued.

The DeFi Education Fund announced the filing on X on Nov. 12:

Illinois' Digital Asset Tax Act is Unlawful and Unenforceable DEF, @a16z, @paradigm, @Uniswap & 14 co-signers joined together to submit an amicus brief supporting @BlockchainAssn, @crypto_council, and @digitalchamber's challenge to the Illinois' Digital Asset Tax Act. 👇 pic.twitter.com/mkoOqPoni1

— DeFi Education Fund (@fund_defi) November 12, 2026

The Crypto Council for Innovation and the Blockchain Association brought the underlying lawsuit in Sangamon County Circuit Court. The DeFi Education Fund, Aave Labs, and Chainlink Labs also signed the amicus brief, alongside 14 additional co-signers.

Federal Support for the Challenge

According to the Blockchain Association, the U.S. Justice Department filed a statement of interest in the case on Nov. 6, arguing that the crypto tax undermines federal policy on digital assets. A statement of interest is how the federal government signals its position in pending litigation, adding a federal voice to the challenge ahead of the industry's amicus filing. The U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association filed a separate brief the same day, extending the opposition beyond crypto-native groups.

How the Draft Rules Would Affect Brokers

Miles Jennings, a16z's policy chief, said autonomous software cannot collect the levy — the crux of the industry's objection, since protocols and interfaces without a central operator would have no clear party to remit the 0.2%. An October letter flagged a draft provision that would require brokers to store customers' private keys; the brief's signers warned of theft risks and proposed requiring public keys instead.

Background on the Illinois Levy

Gov. JB Pritzker signed Illinois' 0.2% crypto tax into law on June 16, 2026. The levy covers qualifying digital asset exchanges, transfers, and storage services, even when no sale or profit takes place — meaning the 0.2% can attach to transfers or storage alone, not only sales. In October, a court-approved agreement delayed its enforcement from January 1 to July 1, 2027, while legal challenges continue, leaving the Sangamon County Circuit Court case as the timeline to watch for how — or whether — the levy takes effect as written.

The dispute also follows a related federal development: an IRS rule would have required certain DeFi platforms to report user transactions, but President Donald Trump signed a congressional resolution repealing it in April 2025.