At Least One Sovereign Wealth Fund Is Selling Gold to Buy Bitcoin, Bitwise Report Finds
Key Takeaways
- •Bitwise's inaugural Institutional Crypto Adoption Report found that at least one sovereign wealth fund liquidated gold and foreign exchange reserves to finance Bitcoin purchases.
- •Interviews with 15 large institutions conducted between March and April 2026 showed that none reduced Bitcoin exposure despite a roughly 50% price decline from about $125,000 in Q4 2025 to near $60,000 in Q2 6.
- •Crypto allocations among surveyed institutions ranged from 0.5% to 13% of investable assets, with most respondents positioned at a conservative 1% to 2%.
- •Most institutions treat Bitcoin and gold as complementary hedges against fiat currency debasement, and stable gold ETF inflows suggest no mass exodus from the metal.
- •Weekly spot Bitcoin ETF inflows peaked at $2.5 billion during the drawdown, which Bitwise credits with making the decline shallower than prior cycles, though the report carries a selection bias toward institutions already holding crypto.

At least one sovereign wealth has been selling gold and foreign exchange reserves to fund Bitcoin purchases, according to Bitwise Asset Management's first Institutional Crypto Adoption Report. The finding, disclosed by Bitwise Head of Research Ryan Rasmussen on September 29, stands as one of the clearest examples yet of a nation-state investment vehicle treating Bitcoin as a direct substitute for traditional reserve assets.
Sovereign wealth funds are state-owned vehicles that manage national reserves, historically allocated across bonds, equities, and gold. Gold has anchored central bank reserves for generations, while Bitcoin has long carried the "digital gold" label in institutional circles. A fund swapping one for the other moves that comparison from talking point to treasury practice.
The report draws on interviews with senior investment professionals across 15 large institutions, conducted between March and April 2026. Its most striking conclusion: through a drawdown of roughly 50%, from approximately $125,000 in Q4 2025 to around $60,000 in Q2 2026, not a single institution surveyed reported reducing its Bitcoin holdings.
Buying the Dip at Sovereign Scale
Bitcoin was the first, largest, and longest-held crypto position at every institution in the survey that held digital assets. Crypto allocations across the surveyed institutions ranged from 0.5% to 13% of total investable assets, though most opted for a more restrained 1% to 2%. Sovereign wealth funds sat at the lower end of that spectrum, constrained by multi-layered governance frameworks that make any novel asset class harder to push through committee.
Bitcoin and Gold: Complements, Not Competitors
Most institutions in the survey explicitly treat the two assets as hedges against fiat currency debasement. Gold ETF inflows remained stable throughout the period, which undercuts any narrative of a mass exodus from the yellow metal. The lone sovereign fund that sold gold to buy Bitcoin appears to be an outlier in degree, not in philosophy.
ETF Inflows as a Structural Shock Absorber
One of the report's more notable claims concerns Bitcoin ETF flows during the drawdown period. Weekly inflows reached as high as $2.5 billion, which Bitwise credits with making the decline shallower than in prior cycles. Spot ETFs hold Bitcoin on investors' behalf through conventional brokerage accounts, the access route that has pulled traditional portfolios into the asset.
The findings also carry an inherent caveat of selection bias. Bitwise interviewed 15 institutions, all of which already held some crypto exposure. The sample says little about the thousands of institutional investors who evaluated Bitcoin and passed.
Where Institutional Adoption Stands
The 0.5% to 13% allocation range provides a useful map of where institutional adoption currently sits. At 1% to 2%, most institutions remain in "toe in the water" territory, while the fund allocating 13% is an aggressive outlier. Whether that gold-selling fund remains a lone experiment or becomes a template for other reserves is the question this dataset cannot yet answer, since its sample of existing holders leaves the institutions still on the sidelines out of frame.
Source: CryptoBriefing