Shiba Eternity adviser Mazrael has publicly rejected claims that Shiba Inu is preparing to restart its ecosystem under a new structure, stating that the reported reconstruction proposal is fake and has no connection to the project's official developers.

The dispute centers on claims attributed to RuggRat, who circulated a proposal describing a significant restructuring of the Shiba Inu ecosystem. The proposal allegedly called for developers to abandon Shibarium, move the ecosystem to another blockchain, and rebuild ShibaSwap through a separate platform. Mazrael disputed those claims and said the individuals promoting the proposal were not affiliated with the teams responsible for Shiba Inu's established ecosystem products.

Disputed Shiba Inu Reconstruction Proposal

According to RuggRat, the alleged plan would represent a major departure from Shiba Inu's existing development roadmap. The proposal reportedly involved replacing several elements of the current ecosystem and establishing an independent operational framework.

The claims included a recommendation to avoid Shib.io on the grounds that the website remains controlled by the former leadership team. RuggRat also said the proposed restructuring could remove Zama and reconsider the roles of BONE, LEASH, and TREAT within the ecosystem.

Under the alleged plan, governance, products, liquidity, and community infrastructure would all be rebuilt, meaning the proposal represented a broad restructuring rather than a limited adjustment to existing Shiba Inu operations.

Mazrael directly challenged the claims, accusing RuggRat of knowingly distributing false information to the wider SHIB community.

"Funny how you keep this up knowing it's fake," Mazrael wrote in response to the claims on X.

Unofficial Shiba DAO Page Raises Security Concerns

RuggRat included a link to a page identified as Shiba DAO while circulating information about the alleged reconstruction proposal. The page displayed a security warning stating that its content could contain scams or potentially malicious material.

That warning added a security dimension to the already disputed claims, particularly for SHIB holders who could be directed toward unofficial websites. The allegations involved major ecosystem components, including ShibaSwap, Shibarium, and potential blockchain migrations.

Mazrael said the individuals behind the messages have no connection to ShibaSwap, Shibarium, or the Zama integration. As a result, the reported reconstruction plan has not received verified backing from the teams responsible for those established Shiba Inu products.

For readers following the SHIB ecosystem, the distinction matters because official development updates typically come through recognized project channels, while migration-style claims can circulate quickly across social platforms before being verified. Unofficial migration-related websites can also present security risks when they request sensitive information or transactions. Such pages may ask users to provide private keys or recovery phrases, approve token transactions, or transfer assets as part of purported migration procedures. SHIB holders are therefore advised to verify ecosystem announcements before connecting wallets, transferring assets, or accessing links distributed by unfamiliar accounts.

Mazrael's rejection leaves the proposed Shiba Inu restart without confirmation from any recognized representatives associated with the existing ecosystem. Based on the available information, the reconstruction proposal remains disputed and has raised both misinformation and security concerns for SHIB holders.