Gulf States Quietly Build Overland Alternatives as Strait of Hormuz Disruption Risk Persists
Key Takeaways
- •Arkan Logistics and SPARK Logistics signed an agreement to establish cross-border freight arrangements between Saudi Arabia and Oman.
- •The companies did not disclose financial terms, projected freight volumes, or an implementation schedule.
- •The freight plan uses the existing direct road link through the Rub’ al Khali, which opened in December 2021 and was the first direct road connection between the two countries.
- •The initiative is intended to improve transit traffic, supply chain efficiency, and the movement of goods across the border.
- •The deal is part of a broader Gulf trend toward building overland trade alternatives amid ongoing concern over disruption risks in the Strait of Hormuz.

Oman-based Arkan Logistics and Saudi Arabia's SPARK Logistics have signed an agreement to establish cross-border freight arrangements using the direct land route between the two countries, according to an announcement from Saudi Arabia's transport ministry. The initiative aims to enhance transit traffic, improve supply chain efficiency, and streamline the movement of goods between the two Gulf economies. The companies have not disclosed financial terms, projected freight volumes, or an implementation timetable.
The agreement builds on infrastructure that already exists rather than creating a new route from scratch. The direct Saudi-Oman road connection through the Rub' al Khali, or Empty Quarter — roughly 580 kilometers of paved highway and the first direct road link between the two countries — opened in December 2021 and eliminated the need for road traffic between them to pass through the United Arab Emirates. The new freight arrangement is essentially a commercial layer on top of that physical link, with the real test being whether it can translate an existing but underused road connection into consistent freight volumes and faster, more efficient border processing between the two markets.
Taken in isolation, the deal is a modest private sector logistics agreement with little standalone significance for freight or shipping pricing. However, it fits squarely into a broader pattern of Gulf states quietly building overland alternatives to maritime chokepoints, a trend that has gathered pace as the Strait of Hormuz — through which roughly a fifth of global oil consumption passes each day — has remained subject to closures and shipping attacks through much of this year. Oil settled higher on Tuesday as Iran kept Hormuz shut and new Gulf attacks resumed. Trump stated he has total control of Hormuz, remarks that jar with weeks of shipping attacks in the region.
In June, Turkey and Saudi Arabia signed a series of memorandums of understanding covering railways and logistics services, centered on reviving the historic Hejaz railway and extending it southward to Oman. Turkish officials described that project explicitly as an alternative global trade corridor capable of reducing reliance on the strait, citing successful trial shipments from Turkey through Iraq to Saudi Arabia as evidence the route is viable.
Separately, Omani officials have pointed to the country's ports outside the strait — including Sultan Qaboos, Salalah, Sohar, and Duqm — as a foundation for building dual land routes and alternative oil pipelines in partnership with the UAE, Qatar, and Saudi Arabia. Salalah and Duqm, both situated on Oman's southern coast facing the Arabian Sea, sit entirely outside the Hormuz transit corridor, allowing them to receive and dispatch cargo without exposure to the strait. Omani officials have framed the current period as an opportunity to accelerate investment in projects that had previously been delayed.
None of these initiatives, including the newly announced Saudi-Oman freight deal, offers near-term relief to shipping capacity through Hormuz. Transport infrastructure of this kind typically takes years to build out and scale, and physical infrastructure and freight volumes require multi-year timelines. What the accumulation of these agreements does suggest is that Gulf governments and logistics operators are increasingly treating extended disruption risk to the strait as a structural planning assumption rather than a temporary disruption to be waited out. The gathering of such agreements is itself a market signal, confirming a direction of travel across the Gulf.
For oil and shipping desks, the more relevant longer-term question is whether any of these overland corridors — from the Saudi-Oman freight tie-up to the proposed Hejaz railway extension — eventually gain enough scale to meaningfully reduce the region's dependence on tanker-dependent trade through the strait. That remains a multi-year story rather than an immediate one, but the direction of travel across multiple independently announced projects points the same way. No single deal solves Hormuz, but the Gulf keeps quietly building its way around it.