Strategy to Leave MSCI World Index at End of November
Key Takeaways
- •MSCI will drop Strategy from the MSCI World Index, the MSCI ACWI and other global benchmarks after the close on November 30, 2026, under its new non-operating company rule finalized on October 15, 2026.
- •Index-tracking passive funds hold an estimated 13 million Strategy shares, about 3.1% of outstanding basic shares, which the company says amounts to less than one day's trading volume.
- •Strategy holds 850,364 BTC acquired at an aggregate cost of USD 64.16 billion and remains dependent on new share issuance to expand its bitcoin holdings.
- •In the week ended November 8, Strategy used about 66% of USD 283.8 million in net share-sale proceeds to repurchase roughly 1.9 million STRC preferred shares, while allocating approximately 29% to buying 1,036 BTC.
- •Strategy has challenged its non-operating classification in a letter to MSCI's Equity Index Committee, and S&P and FTSE Russell have not yet decided whether to adopt comparable definitions.

MSCI will remove Strategy from its global equity indexes after the close of trading on November 30, 2026. The affected benchmarks include the MSCI World Index, MSCI's developed-markets benchmark, and the MSCI ACWI (All Country World Index).
The exclusion will not force Strategy to sell bitcoin, but it could make it more difficult for the company to finance additional purchases. MSCI provides equity indexes replicated by passive funds and exchange-traded funds worldwide. When a stock is removed from an index, those funds generally have to sell their holdings.
Strategy is a digital asset treasury company that regularly buys bitcoin. It currently holds one of the largest corporate bitcoin treasuries, 850,364 BTC, financed through the issuance of common and preferred shares. The removal follows a new rule for so-called non-operating companies that MSCI published in final form in October 2026. The rule replaces a transitional restriction aimed at companies whose digital assets accounted for at least 50% of total assets.
MSCI is implementing the new rule through its November 11, 2026, index review. According to Strategy's own estimate, affected index funds hold approximately 13 million Strategy shares, equivalent to 3.1% of the company's outstanding basic shares.
Why Strategy is leaving the MSCI World Index
The new rule applies to the MSCI Global Investable Market Indexes and evaluates companies in two stages. First, MSCI assesses whether substantial operating assets represent at least 50% of total assets. It then applies five financial metrics covering expenses, cash flow, changes in asset value and reliance on external financing, among other factors.
A company is considered ineligible if it fails the asset test and at least four of the five financial metrics. The rule does not specifically mention bitcoin. It also includes a buffer for existing index constituents: they are removed only if they fail the test in both of the two most recent annual reporting periods. MSCI may also use the latest interim financial statements. For prospective additions, however, the threshold is higher, as failing in just one of the two periods is sufficient.
MSCI says the rule is intended to reduce index turnover and the number of rebalancing trades — the buying and selling that passive funds must carry out whenever index membership changes. Formally, the framework is therefore bitcoin-neutral. Its application nevertheless identified Strategy at an early stage.
An August 2026 consultation paper included a simulation of the ACWI IMI using data from May 2026. The simulation flagged Strategy, Metaplanet and Yellow Cake for removal. The consultation ran from August 3 through September 30, and MSCI published the final rules on October 15.
The same review will remove Metaplanet from the MSCI Japan Small Cap Index, among other changes. Upexi will leave the MSCI USA Micro Cap Index, while Yellow Cake in the UK small-cap index and Iceland's Skel Fjárfestingafélag are also affected. The review therefore removes all three companies identified in the simulation.
Passive selling pressure expected to remain manageable
Strategy's removal will not delist its stock or require the company to sell bitcoin. Only funds tracking MSCI's global investable market indexes must sell their Strategy holdings. Those sales will take place on the effective date, after the market close on November 30.
Strategy estimated that the affected funds' approximately 13 million shares represent less than one day's trading volume. Based on the company's calculation, the resulting forced selling should therefore remain limited.
JPMorgan estimated the potential outflows in November 2025. At that time, the bank projected approximately USD 2.8 billion in outflows if MSCI excluded Strategy. If other index providers followed suit, as much as USD 8.8 billion more could be added.
That estimate was based on the original proposal, which targeted companies holding digital assets equal to at least 50% of total assets. As a result, the figure applies to the final rule only to a limited extent. MSCI has not published an estimate of the potential outflows under the final framework.
Bitcoin purchases depend on capital raising
Strategy finances its bitcoin purchases through several channels, including convertible bonds and the preferred shares STRF, STRC, STRK and STRD. The company also sells common stock through an at-the-market program, under which newly issued shares are sold into the market over time at prevailing prices.
This model depends on Strategy's stock trading at a premium to the value of its bitcoin holdings. The relevant measure is mNAV, which compares the company's market capitalization with the value of its bitcoin holdings. When mNAV falls below 1, issuing new shares dilutes existing shareholders rather than increasing the amount of bitcoin held per share. Any decline in the stock price following the index exclusion would reduce that premium.
The company's 8-K filing dated November 9, 2026 shows a shift in how it used the proceeds from recent capital raising. During the week ended November 8, Strategy sold 2,051,348 common shares and received net proceeds of USD 283.8 million. It did not issue any preferred shares.
Of the proceeds, USD 81.9 million was used to purchase 1,036 BTC at an average price of USD 79,012 per bitcoin. That represented approximately 29% of the total. Strategy used another USD 188.3 million, or about 66%, to repurchase 1,887,464 of its own STRC preferred shares. The buyback was more than twice the size of the bitcoin purchase. The remaining USD 13.6 million stayed on the company's balance sheet as cash.
In the previous week, Strategy had repurchased 2,092,035 STRC shares for USD 208.2 million. The company did not sell any bitcoin during the week.
Strategy's holdings now total 850,364 BTC, acquired at an aggregate cost of USD 64.16 billion. The average purchase price was USD 75,456 per bitcoin. Its USD reserve stood at USD 4.77 billion, while the company used USD 21.1 million for preferred dividends during the week.
Despite the recent allocation of proceeds, Strategy continues to depend on new share issuance to expand its bitcoin holdings.
Strategy disputes its non-operating classification
Strategy challenged the proposed rule at an early stage. In an August 31, 2026, letter to MSCI's Equity Index Committee, the company asked MSCI to withdraw the proposal. Strategy described the consultation proposal as discriminatory, arbitrary and misguided. It also said that removal from the indexes would have no material impact on its business.
Strategy argues that it reports its bitcoin business as an operating segment under US GAAP. The company considers the rule's bitcoin-neutral language to be a repackaging of the earlier proposal targeting companies with digital assets equal to at least 50% of total assets.
The issue extends beyond Strategy. Whether a company whose balance sheet consists largely of bitcoin qualifies as an operating company affects its access to major equity indexes and, in turn, to passive capital. Its stock will continue to trade, but index funds adjust their holdings according to index weights.
The same review affects Metaplanet and Upexi, which also operate as crypto treasury firms. S&P and FTSE Russell have not decided whether to introduce a comparable definition. Their pending decisions are the next development to watch for the digital asset treasury sector, as each provider's definition determines whether these companies remain eligible for its benchmarks.
Source: Crypto Valley Journal