NewsMacroFox News' Laura Ingraham Tells Trump to 'Do Some Hard Thinking' and 'Move On' from Iran War

Fox News' Laura Ingraham Tells Trump to 'Do Some Hard Thinking' and 'Move On' from Iran War

Author: Alternet·

Key Takeaways

  • •Fox News host Laura Ingraham, one of the most prominent pro-Trump voices, publicly urged President Trump on Friday to move on from the war with Iran.
  • •Ingraham linked the GOP's midterm defeat to the Iran war, citing a Fox News analysis in which 94 percent of midterm voters said the conflict was a major factor in their vote.
  • •She argued Trump is unlikely to secure funding to sustain the war once Democrats assume congressional majorities in January, because Congress controls government spending.
  • •Ingraham presented Trump with two choices: continue an unpopular conflict at significant political cost, echoing the Iraq war, or cut losses and refocus on voters' priorities like living standards and gas prices.
  • •She warned that a major new attack could lead Iran to knock out 40 percent of Gulf oil infrastructure, potentially driving oil to $175 a barrel.
Fox News' Laura Ingraham Tells Trump to 'Do Some Hard Thinking' and 'Move On' from Iran War

Fox News host Laura Ingraham on Friday delivered a blunt message to President Donald Trump: it is time to "move on" from the war with Iran. She urged him to "do some hard thinking" about whether continuing the conflict is good for the country, and whether he wants it to destroy his MAGA coalition once and for all. The intervention carried weight because of where it came from: Ingraham has been among the most prominent pro-Trump voices on Fox News, meaning the warning arrived from inside the president's media base rather than from his opponents.

Speaking in the wake of the GOP's "staggering defeat" in the midterm elections, Ingraham argued that Trump's decision to launch the war came with a major political cost for him and his party. She added that he is unlikely to receive the funds needed to sustain it once Democrats take their congressional majorities in January. That timeline matters because Congress holds the power of the purse, giving the incoming majority direct leverage over funding for the conflict, and it is the practical constraint behind the choice she laid out.

Against that backdrop, Ingraham warned, Trump faces two options. The first is to follow the path taken by President George W. Bush, an implicit reference to the long and costly Iraq war, and continue doubling down on a wildly unpopular war, a course she said would inflict tremendous political damage on the GOP while causing Americans to struggle, likely with few gains on Iran. The second involves simply "accepting the facts and moving on."

Couching that second route in language likely to appeal to Trump's dealmaker self-image, Ingraham asserted, "It's the type of option a successful businessman undertakes when a particular venture has failed, and it's just time to cut your losses." Its major benefit, she said, is that it is "what the voters want," which is "the whole point of politics." The option, she advised, would allow Trump "to move on from the war and to focus on the voters' desires, fulfilling them, and also on all of his many accomplishments."

"Now, those accomplishments – which are numerous and impressive – are being overlooked now because of voters' concern with the war and, of course, frustration and even anger, as we saw in the votes, about high gas prices," she continued.

Ingraham noted that a Fox News analysis found that 94 percent of midterm voters said the Iran war was a major factor in their vote. "That's just a fact," she added. "It's not an opinion. That's what we found. And pretty much every opinion poll since the election found the same thing."

She also cited strategic and economic considerations. "Right now, public sentiment makes it impossible for the U.S. to destroy the Iranian regime… Let's never lose sight of the fact that we're up against fanatics. The notion that we're going to change the regime's mind with a few bombing runs is delusional," Ingraham said.

"The longer we're bogged down, the weaker we become, hurting our munition stockpiles and further eroding public support," she warned, "not to mention, perhaps, if Iran responds to some major new attack by knocking out 40 percent of the oil infrastructure in the Gulf. That could send oil up to $175 a barrel. And what would that do to the rest of the Trump presidency? Anyone who's telling the president otherwise about option two is either foolish or lying or has other ulterior motives."

According to Ingraham, the "Trump coalition" abandoned the GOP in the midterms because "they want higher living standards, lower gas prices, and an end to endless wars in the Middle East." The "endless wars" phrasing echoed the "America First" argument that helped fuel Trump's 2016 rise.

Faced with these facts, she concluded: "The president is going to have to do some hard thinking. His staff around him is going to have to do some hard thinking." In the days ahead, the immediate things to watch are whether other prominent conservative voices echo her position and whether the White House responds publicly.

Her full remarks can be viewed on Fox News: Fox News video.