Two decades ago, James Chen walked into the World Bank convinced he had solved a problem affecting 2.2 billion people. He was wrong about the solution — but right about the problem, and it took a two-year rejection to teach him the difference.

Chen had invested heavily in adjustable-power lenses that he believed could be a game-changer for low-income countries. The World Bank was not convinced. After two years of lobbying, he received a definitive no.

Most donors would have treated that as the end of the idea. Chen saw it as the beginning of a different one. Rather than retreating, he absorbed the failure and launched Vision for a Nation, a charity designed to test whether universal eyecare could function at national scale — starting in Rwanda, a country that eyecare professionals at the time insisted could not support it.

By taking on the full financial risk himself, training 2,700 local nurses, and conducting screenings across all 15,000 of Rwanda's villages, the organization built a national health model that proved the skeptics wrong. Rwanda became the first country in the world with universal access to affordable vision correction.

Philanthropy has always been judged less by intention than by outcome, Chen argues — and today, as public trust in institutions frays, that scrutiny has never been sharper. The debate is no longer simply about whether the wealthy are giving back, but about what their giving actually achieves: whether it is genuinely moving the needle on a social or environmental issue, or merely funding safe, low-risk projects such as eponymous hospital wings or alma mater donations for quiet recognition. That question has only grown more pointed since the Giving Pledge launched in 2010, drawing commitments from over 240 billionaires — and raising parallel questions about whether those pledges translate into measurable impact or simply larger endowments.

Donating to check a box or build a reputation accomplishes very little, Chen contends. It undermines what he calls the true superpower of philanthropy: its unique agency to serve as early-stage risk capital for radical, systemic innovation. Unlike governments or private institutions, philanthropists do not have taxpayers and shareholders to keep happy, nor do they need permission to pursue an ambitious goal. That freedom gives them the ability to absorb the cost of a failed bet — and to ensure that when a bold gamble pays off, the benefits are socialized globally.

Chen learned the necessity of this risk-taking, "moonshot mindset" through two decades of his own philanthropy, working to make vision correction a universal right for the 2.2 billion people affected worldwide — a population the World Health Organization had flagged in its 2019 World Report on Vision as a growing public health crisis, yet one that remained chronically underfunded relative to its scale.

Audacious projects, however, require time and capital. The ten years it took to bring Rwanda from concept to completion taught Chen what a moonshot mindset actually demands. Attempting to replicate that model country-by-country with finite private capital would have taken lifetimes. To de-risk the issue for global institutions that still viewed vision as a low priority, Chen concluded he needed to disrupt the status quo among world leaders.

He founded the Clearly campaign and commissioned rigorous research trials to demonstrate the economic impact of vision correction. A randomized controlled trial among tea-pickers in Assam, India, showed that workers given glasses experienced a 21.7% increase in daily productivity. The Lancet Global Health Commission on Global Eye Health would later estimate that untreated vision impairment costs the global economy approximately $411 billion in lost productivity each year — a figure that underscored the campaign's central argument.

By reframing eyecare from an overlooked health issue into a significant economic growth driver, the campaign produced the evidence base that led the United Nations to pass its landmark 2021 resolution, committing all 193 member states to eyecare for all by 2030.

This, Chen says, is what high-risk, bold philanthropy looks like in practice: using patient capital to prove a concept, absorb potential failure, and generate the irrefutable evidence needed to unlock institutional scale.

The world now stands at the precipice of a new era in giving, Chen writes. The great wealth transfer is projected to hand upward of $124 trillion to a new generation by 2048, while pioneering technology founders and AI investors are generating unprecedented wealth through radical disruption. These individuals already possess the entrepreneurial drive and risk tolerance that modern philanthropy desperately lacks, Chen observes.

While many may not yet know where or how to deploy their capital for maximum societal impact, Chen argues this moment must not be allowed to slip away. The new generation should be encouraged to bring their disruptive instincts into the philanthropic sphere, shaping their giving into a catalytic, high-reward force and redefining what it truly means to be a "good" billionaire.

Private capital possesses a singular, untapped power to confront the most daunting global crises, Chen concludes. It is time, he says, that it was deployed with the ambition it deserves.

James Chen is the founder of the Clearly campaign and chairman of The Chen Yet-Sen Family Foundation.

The opinions expressed in Fortune.com commentary pieces are solely the views of their authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions and beliefs of Fortune.

This story was originally featured on Fortune.com.