Europol Warns Crypto Wallets Are 'Primary Risk' for Quantum Attacks
Key Takeaways
- •Europol's reports warn that a sufficiently powerful quantum computer could derive private keys from exposed public keys, identifying cryptocurrency wallets as the primary point of exposure to quantum threats.
- •Glassnode estimated in May that 6.04 million BTC, or 30.2% of the issued Bitcoin supply, has already had its public key exposed, making pre-emptive migration to new wallets the only solution for those funds.
- •NIST-standardized post-quantum signatures are 10 to 120 times larger than Bitcoin's current ECDSA signatures, and a 2024 study estimates migrating all unspent transaction outputs would require at least 76 days of cumulative network downtime.
- •IBM and Microsoft both target scalable, fault-tolerant quantum computing by 2029, while a 2025 expert survey put the odds of a machine breaking RSA-2048 encryption within a decade at 28% to 49%.
- •Europol recommends a European Commission working group including ENISA and the EU Anti-Money Laundering Authority, and NIST has proposed deprecating common public-key configurations by 2030 and phasing out classical public-key cryptography by 2035.

EU law enforcement agency Europol on Wednesday published two reports urging organizations, policymakers, and the cryptocurrency industry to begin preparing now for quantum computers capable of breaking widely used encryption.
The first, Quantum Computing and Cryptocurrencies, produced by Europol's European Cybercrime Centre, identifies cryptocurrency wallets as “the primary point of exposure to quantum threats.” Wallets rely on a pair of keys: a private key that authorizes transactions and a public key that the network uses to verify them.
A sufficiently powerful quantum computer could derive a private key from an exposed public key, allowing an attacker to spend funds without authorization, the report says — an event often referred to as Q-Day. No computer with that capability exists today; the agency's argument is that the migration ahead is too large to postpone until one does.
The hash functions that link blocks and underpin mining are largely quantum-safe, however, since breaking a 256-bit hash would still take a number of operations the report calls “astronomically high with foreseeable technology.”
“Cryptocurrencies will not collapse due to quantum computing,” the report concludes, while recommending “proactive defence” to ensure their long-term security. It recommends a phased transition to quantum-resistant cryptography — algorithms designed to withstand attacks from quantum as well as classical computers — alongside improvements to wallet security and key management.
Wallets whose public keys are already visible on-chain cannot be secured after the fact. For those, “the only solution is pre-emptive migration,” the report says, with owners moving funds to new wallets before any attack. Blockchain analytics firm Glassnode estimated in May that 6.04 million BTC, or 30.2% of the issued supply, has already had its public key exposed. In Bitcoin, a public key is generally revealed the first time an address sends funds, and some of the network's earliest outputs recorded keys in plain form.
Upgrading Bitcoin carries its own costs. NIST-standardized post-quantum signatures are 10 to 120 times larger than the ECDSA (Elliptic Curve Digital Signature Algorithm) signatures Bitcoin uses today, which the report says threatens to overload block space, raise fees, and slow confirmations. It cites a 2024 study estimating that migrating every unspent transaction output would require at least 76 days of cumulative network downtime, or roughly 300 days if the work took up 25% of each block.
On timing, the report cites IBM's roadmap, which targets a fault-tolerant quantum computer — one stable enough to run long, error-corrected algorithms — by 2029, and a 2025 survey in which 32 experts put the odds of a machine breaking RSA-2048 encryption in 24 hours within the next decade at 28% to 49%. Microsoft likewise expects scalable quantum computing by 2029, while Google research in March and an AI-assisted competition in September both lowered resource estimates for attacking the elliptic curve cryptography Bitcoin uses.
Parallel industry efforts are also under way. Coinbase's quantum advisory council urged developers in June to begin post-quantum migration now, while Ripple and the Stellar Development Foundation have published migration roadmaps. In July, nine firms including BlackRock, Coinbase, and Strategy pledged a combined $15 million over three years for Bitcoin security research, including quantum defenses.
“Harvest now, decrypt later”
The second report, Harvest Now, Decrypt Later, developed with Spain's University Carlos III of Madrid, examines attackers who collect encrypted data today to decrypt it later. It found widely used protocols such as TLS, SSH, and OpenPGP susceptible, with risk varying by configuration and key management.
There is “currently no clear evidence” that the technique is being systematically exploited at scale, the report says. The resources required make government communications and confidential business data the most plausible targets.
The European Union's three financial supervisors flagged the same tactic in September, warning that a quantum computer capable of breaking encryption could arrive before the technology has any viable commercial use. The EU's NIS Cooperation Group has recommended that member states adopt a post-quantum migration strategy by the end of 2026.
For payments, the cryptocurrency report says real-time interception poses a more immediate quantum risk than retrospective decryption. It describes a “just-in-time” attack, in which a quantum computer derives a private key during the short window between a transaction exposing its public key and that transaction being confirmed.
Europol recommends a European Commission working group, including Europol, the EU cybersecurity agency ENISA, and the EU Anti-Money Laundering Authority, to brief policymakers regularly. The U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology has proposed deprecating today's most common public-key configurations by 2030 and phasing out classical public-key cryptography by 2035, according to the second report.