Ethereum developers propose measures to secure ETH staking against quantum threats
Key Takeaways
- •The draft proposal was filed on August 24 by Ethereum researchers including Kevaundray Wedderburn and Thomas Coratger.
- •The design keeps existing BLS validators compatible while adding a path toward quantum-safe cryptographic schemes.
- •The proposal includes an irreversible switch that would retire BLS signatures once the network is ready.
- •It is part of the Ethereum Foundation’s Strawmap roadmap, which targets a full leanXMSS-based migration around 2029.
- •The immediate impact on current validators is limited, with no action required during the initial transition phase.

Ethereum researchers filed a draft proposal on August 24 for a post-quantum-ready validator deposit contract, laying the groundwork for what could become the network’s most consequential security upgrade in years. The goal is to ensure that the roughly 37 million ETH currently locked in staking does not become vulnerable if quantum computers mature faster than expected.
The proposal, authored by researchers Kevaundray Wedderburn and Thomas Coratger among others, introduces a deposit framework that supports variable-length public keys and metadata through scheme identifiers. It is designed to create a flexible entry point for future quantum-safe cryptographic schemes without requiring the network to be rebuilt from scratch.
Why the urgency, and why now
In March 2026, Google Quantum AI published research suggesting the number of qubits needed to break elliptic-curve cryptography, the mathematical foundation behind most blockchain signatures, could be roughly 20 times lower than previously estimated.
The Ethereum Foundation has said that no viable quantum threat exists at present. Even so, cryptographic migrations are typically slow and complex, and implementing them properly can take years. That timeline matters for Ethereum because consensus changes are coordinated across a large validator set and multiple client teams, so the earlier a migration path is defined, the more room there is for testing and compatibility work before any emergency is needed.
Around 1 million validators currently secure the Ethereum network using BLS signatures. These signatures rely on the same elliptic-curve mathematics that quantum algorithms such as Shor’s could eventually undermine. The new deposit contract preserves full BLS compatibility during the transition period, meaning existing validators do not need to take immediate action. It also includes an irreversible BLS retirement switch, which would permanently phase out the vulnerable signature scheme once activated.
The Strawmap and the 2029 target
The proposal is part of what the Ethereum Foundation calls the “I* milestone” on its Strawmap roadmap, a multi-year plan for migrating consensus-layer infrastructure to quantum-resistant cryptography.
The end state, targeted for around 2029, envisions a full migration to leanXMSS-based signatures. LeanXMSS is a hash-based signature scheme, so its security does not depend on mathematical problems that quantum computers are specifically designed to solve.
The proposed deposit contract is intentionally algorithm-agnostic, allowing the community to assess competing schemes as the field develops.
Separately, EIP-8141 is being considered for integration into the Hegota hard fork, expected in late 2026. That proposal focuses on account abstraction for opt-in quantum-safe signatures and addresses a complementary piece of the puzzle on the execution layer. Taken together, the two efforts would provide quantum resistance across both the consensus and execution layers of the network.
A dedicated team and collaborative development
The Ethereum Foundation formalized its work on the issue by establishing a Post-Quantum Security team led by Thomas Coratger. The team runs weekly interoperation development networks, or devnets, involving more than ten client teams.
What this means for stakers and the broader market
For the roughly 1 million validators currently operating on Ethereum, the immediate impact is limited. The proposal is intended to be non-disruptive in its initial phase, with no action required from existing stakers until the ecosystem is ready for a full transition. For the wider ecosystem, the main significance is that the migration path is being discussed in protocol terms rather than as a last-minute emergency, which gives wallet providers, client teams, and staking infrastructure operators more time to align on implementation details as the work progresses.