NewsStocksBona Film Group's Fully AI-Generated Film Flops at the Chinese Box Office

Bona Film Group's Fully AI-Generated Film Flops at the Chinese Box Office

Author: CryptoBriefing·

Key Takeaways

  • •Sanxingdui: Future Past earned roughly $180,000 (about 1.21 million yuan) in its opening days, recouping only around a tenth of its reported $1.5 million production budget.
  • •The film premiered on October 23 with more than 10,000 scheduled screenings but averaged just two viewers per screening, with occupancy rates falling to 0.1%.
  • •It became the first fully AI-generated film to receive a public screening permit in China, with the National Film Administration classifying it as animation.
  • •Bona Film Group spent more than two years and involved nearly 100 staff on the production, generating over 1.2 million images with AI tools while human experts retained creative control.
  • •Viewer complaints focused on low quality and ticket prices ranging from 20 to 90 yuan, while Bona's stock reportedly declined after the release and the company's AI-related revenue stands at about 0.42% of its total.
Bona Film Group's Fully AI-Generated Film Flops at the Chinese Box Office

China's first fully AI-generated feature film to reach cinemas has stumbled at the box office. Sanxingdui: Future Past, produced by Bona Film Group, one of China's most established film studios, brought in an estimated $180,000 through Monday, according to ticketing platform Maoyan — a fraction of the roughly $1.5 million the film reportedly cost to make, according to AFP. Audiences, it turned out, did not line up to watch a movie about AI enslaving humanity that was itself made by AI.

The numbers behind the flop

The science-fiction thriller follows an archaeologist tasked with saving a future world that AI has enslaved, according to Chinese state media. It premiered in cinemas on October 23.

By October 26-27, cumulative ticket sales had reached about 1.21 million yuan, or roughly $181,000. The production budget exceeded 10 million yuan, which works out to approximately $1.5 million.

Distribution was not the problem. The film had more than 10,000 screenings scheduled on its opening day. Reports indicated an average of just two viewers per screening, with occupancy rates falling to 0.1%. Given the breadth of the release, the shortfall pointed to weak demand rather than limited availability.

The warning signs arrived early. Presale figures came in under 80,000 to 100,000 yuan, suggesting limited audience appetite before the film even opened. Viewers who did show up cited two main complaints: low quality and high ticket prices, which ranged from 20 to 90 yuan.

Taken together, the figures mean the theatrical run recouped roughly a tenth of the production budget within its opening days.

How the film was made

Despite the outcome, the project represented a substantial undertaking rather than a low-cost experiment. Bona spent more than two years on the film, with nearly 100 staff members involved. The team generated more than 1.2 million images using AI tools, while human experts kept creative control over the narrative and artistic direction.

The film also cleared a regulatory milestone. It became the first fully AI-generated film to receive a public screening permit in China, and the National Film Administration classified it as animation. The story draws on China's ancient Sanxingdui archaeological site — a Bronze Age settlement in Sichuan province known for the oversized bronze masks and sculptures unearthed there over decades of excavation — giving it a cultural hook alongside its technology pitch. Bona CEO Jiang Defu positioned the production as a pioneering step for AI in cinema.

Microdramas versus the big screen

The flop stands out because AI-generated content has been performing well elsewhere in China. Short-form AI content, including microdramas — tightly serialized episodes produced quickly for smartphone viewing — has found audiences on social media platforms. The contrast highlights a divide within Bona's own business: the company's AI-related revenue remains a small fraction of its total, about 0.42%, even though its short-form AI content carries strong margins.

What it means for Bona and AI filmmaking

The most immediate fallout from the opening is for Bona's investors. The company's stock reportedly declined following the film's release. For shareholders, the question is less about one film and more about strategy. If AI production is supposed to lower costs and open new revenue streams, a project that cost more than 10 million yuan and returned about 1.21 million yuan in ticket sales undercuts that pitch, at least for theatrical releases.

The complaints viewers raised point to where the real hurdle sits. Low quality and high prices are fixable in theory, but both pull in opposite directions. Lowering prices erodes revenue, while raising quality likely requires more time, more staff, or better tools. The opening numbers suggest the economics of AI production may play out differently on the big screen than in short-form content. Maoyan's tallies through the rest of the run will show whether the numbers stabilize, and with the screening-permit path now on the record, whether other Chinese studios attempt fully AI-generated theatrical releases remains an open question.