Binance Whale Ratio Hits Highest Level Since 2017 as Bitcoin Slips
Key Takeaways
- •The 100-day simple moving average of the Binance whale ratio rose from 0.481 on October 31 to 0.513 on November 6, its highest reading since September 2017.
- •Bitcoin declined from about $77,500 on October 31 to $75,800 and is down 11.3% over the past month, though it remains 17% higher over three months.
- •Binance's October 29 hot-wallet hack, with approximately $6.2 billion to $6.4 billion reportedly stolen, may have influenced large transfers, so the rising ratio cannot be treated as straightforward evidence of deliberate whale selling.
- •The underlying Exchange Whale Ratio nearly reached 1.0 on October 31, meaning large-holder transactions accounted for almost all of the exchange flow measured that day.
- •US September job openings of 7.52 million and the November 6 NFP report added macro backdrop, but these indicators do not directly measure whale activity on Binance.

Binance Whale Ratio Hits Highest Level Since 2017 as Bitcoin Slips
Whales are accounting for a larger share of Binance's measured transaction flow, and the move has coincided with weakness in Bitcoin's price. The 100-day simple moving average (SMA) of the Binance whale ratio reached 0.513 on November 6, its highest reading since September 2017. Over the same window, $BTC slipped from roughly $77,500 on October 31 to $75,800.
Exchange Whale Ratio Climbs as BTC Weakens
The metric is built from the size distribution of transfers into the exchange, so any unusually large transaction counts toward the large-holder share regardless of its purpose — one reason size alone does not reveal intent. The underlying Exchange Whale Ratio nearly reached 1.0 on October 31, meaning large-holder transactions accounted for almost all of the exchange flow measured that day. The 100-day average then climbed from 0.481 on October 31 to 0.513 on November 6. Readings above the 0.5 mark indicate large transfers account for roughly half of the measured flow, which is why the series is watched as a gauge of how much large-holder supply is reaching an exchange. Because the SMA smooths daily data, its rise points to elevated transfer levels sustained through the recent window rather than a single-day jump.
The increase came as Bitcoin struggled. The asset is down 11.3% over the past month, though it remains 17% higher over three months.
October Hack Complicates the Whale Activity Picture
There is a significant complication. Binance suffered a hot-wallet hack on October 29, with approximately $6.2 billion to $6.4 billion reportedly stolen. Hot wallets are internet-connected wallets exchanges use to process deposits and withdrawals, in contrast to offline cold storage. The incident may have affected large transfers during the same period, so treating the rising whale ratio as straightforward evidence of deliberate selling would be premature. The available figures do not establish what those large transactions represented.
JOLTS and NFP Add to Market Uncertainty
US job openings reached 7.52 million in September, according to JOLTS data released on November 3, and the November 6 NFP report also fell within this period. JOLTS — the Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey — and nonfarm payrolls are among the most closely followed US labor-market releases, making this a data-heavy stretch for macro watchers. The dollar index, which measures the dollar against a basket of major currencies, stood at 101.56, roughly unchanged over one month. These macro indicators provide background, but they do not directly measure whale activity on Binance, and any connection remains speculative.
More Context Needed Before Drawing Conclusions
One possible explanation is that transfers linked to the hack, or reactions to macroeconomic data, lifted the whale share. Neither explanation has been verified. Two developments would help clarify the picture: confirmation of whether hack-related transfers were captured in the measured flows, and whether the 100-day average holds near 0.513 or recedes in upcoming readings.
For now, the data show rising large-holder activity alongside a weaker Bitcoin price. The series still requires verification, and the short observation window does not establish whether whales are selling, repositioning, or simply moving funds.