Population aging ranks among Asia's most defining social challenges. As life expectancy rises and fertility rates remain depressed, several Asian economies now confront a shrinking labor force paired with a growing proportion of elderly citizens. The issue is most often framed in fiscal terms: escalating healthcare expenditures and a contracting workforce impose intensifying strain on government budgets.

Yet that perspective overlooks a more consequential question: what if longer lifespans could bolster, rather than burden, economic expansion?

Population aging undeniably drives higher healthcare spending. Older adults require more frequent medical attention, including treatment for chronic conditions. Newer and more effective therapies tend to cost more. Sedentary lifestyles, heightened health awareness, and broader access to medical services have also increased utilization of healthcare systems across the region.

However, aging need not function as an economic and fiscal drag. With the right policy framework, it can generate an economic dividend. As populations grow older, healthcare policy will become increasingly interconnected with macroeconomic policy—particularly in the areas of labor markets and economic growth. A well-architected healthcare system can keep people healthier and economically productive for longer, thereby sustaining broader economic vitality.

Lessons from Singapore and Japan

Singapore and Japan illustrate that rising healthcare costs are not synonymous with unsustainable ones.

Singapore's healthcare system blends public subsidies with mandatory medical savings and co-payments, incentivizing individuals to assume greater responsibility for their own healthcare expenditures while maintaining affordability. Its financing framework rests on the 3Ms—MediSave, MediShield Life, and MediFund—which help rein in costs while safeguarding access to affordable care for Singapore residents. Policymakers prioritize disease prevention through demand-side programs such as Healthier SG and Age Well SG, which encourage healthier lifestyles, regular health screenings, and more robust community support networks.

These initiatives form part of a wider transition away from hospital-centered models toward preventive and community-based care. On the supply side, authorities are leveraging digitalization, artificial intelligence (AI), and enhanced price transparency to boost efficiency and reduce costs.

Japan has adopted a distinct strategy. Its universal healthcare system delivers broad and equitable access through a nationally regulated fee schedule that standardizes medical prices. Coverage is furnished by Employees' Health Insurance and National Health Insurance programs, with private insurance serving only a supplementary function. Japanese policymakers concentrate on continuous reform to keep care fiscally sustainable as the demographic profile shifts.

Japan pairs preventive health campaigns, including Health Japan 21, with digitalization, periodic medical fee revisions, cost-effectiveness evaluations of new health technologies, and tighter integration of medical and long-term care. Collectively, these steps improve efficiency while maintaining universal access to treatment.

Turning Aging Into an Economic Opportunity

Although Singapore and Japan employ fundamentally different healthcare models—Singapore leaning on compulsory savings and cost-sharing, Japan relying on social health insurance—both nations share a core philosophy: healthcare systems should prioritize spending better, not merely spending more.

Enhancing the efficiency of healthcare delivery, reinforcing community-based care, and channeling investment into prevention can yield better health outcomes while helping control costs over the long term.

Both governments regard healthy aging as an economic opportunity rather than purely a healthcare objective. Improved health allows older individuals to remain economically engaged for longer, partially offsetting workforce contraction and underpinning sustained growth. This is especially significant for economies that have long relied on a demographic dividend—a large working-age population relative to dependents—to power economic expansion. As that dividend narrows across much of Asia, extending productive working lives becomes one of the few levers capable of softening the growth impact.

Singapore advances this goal through labor market policies that foster lifelong learning, career transitions, re-employment, and age-friendly workplaces. Japan similarly supplements its healthcare reforms with measures designed to keep older workers economically active. Such policies are growing ever more critical for enhancing older workers' employability as AI and technological transformation reshape occupational requirements and skill demands, as highlighted in the OECD Employment Outlook 2025.

The result is that Japan and Singapore rank among global leaders in both healthy life expectancy and labor force participation among older workers. Their track record indicates that better health directly expands the capacity of older individuals to stay economically active.

Policy Lessons for ASEAN+3

ASEAN+3—a regional grouping uniting ASEAN members with China, Japan, and Korea—spans economies at widely varying stages of demographic transition and healthcare system maturity. China and Korea are experiencing some of the most rapid demographic shifts in the region, while several Southeast Asian economies, including the Philippines and Indonesia, still possess relatively young populations and a window before aging accelerates. This diversity means that timing and sequencing of reforms will differ: economies further along the aging curve face more immediate fiscal pressures, while younger economies have an opportunity to build resilient systems before demographic headwinds intensify. Health spending efficiency differs sharply across the region, according to the ASEAN+3 Regional Economic Outlook (AFPR 2026), produced by AMRO, the macroeconomic surveillance organization serving ASEAN+3 members. While higher-income economies generally achieve superior health outcomes, system design and service delivery effectiveness also significantly shape how efficiently healthcare resources are deployed.

Japan's nationally regulated fee schedule, for instance, standardizes medical prices and undergoes regular revision to promote more efficient service delivery. In some ASEAN countries, however, shortages or uneven geographic distribution of healthcare professionals restrict access, especially in rural areas, as documented in the OECD's Health at a Glance: Asia-Pacific 2024.

Although national priorities vary, many ASEAN+3 economies share a common imperative: adapting healthcare systems and labor market policies to support healthier, longer, and more productive lives.

The experiences of Japan and Singapore yield several lessons with broad regional applicability.

First, healthcare strategies should assign greater weight to prevention. Redirecting resources toward preventive and community-based care can improve health outcomes through earlier diagnosis and treatment, along with improved management of chronic diseases.

Second, policymakers should concentrate on outcomes rather than raw spending levels. Healthcare expenditure must translate into measurable improvements in health and economic results. All economies should pursue gains in efficiency and quality while aligning capacity with long-term demand. For economies with limited access, however, the immediate priority should be expanding basic capacity and coverage.

Third, governments should fortify the connections between health and labor market policies. Pairing healthcare reform with lifelong learning programs, age-friendly workplace initiatives, and flexible employment arrangements can retain older people in the workforce. This approach can counteract the economic effects of population aging while broadening opportunities for older individuals who wish to continue working.

Aging will reshape Asia's economies irrespective of policy decisions. What remains within policymakers' control is whether it becomes a fiscal liability or a growth catalyst. As Japan and Singapore have shown, managing aging extends well beyond cost containment: thoughtfully designed healthcare and labor market policies can actively propel growth by enabling healthier, longer, and more productive working lives.

The opinions expressed in Fortune.com commentary pieces are solely the views of their authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions and beliefs of Fortune.

This story was originally featured on Fortune.com.