The United States is growing older—a demographic shift that is widely recognized. By 2030, all members of the Baby Boomer generation will have reached age 65, and the U.S. Census Bureau projects that the population aged 65 and older will surpass 73 million. Less apparent, however, is the country's failure to build the infrastructure families need to navigate aging. As a result, growing old in America has become what amounts to an invisible tax, paid not only in dollars but in time, productivity, opportunity, and financial security.

The burden affects nearly every family, though in different ways. One trend is becoming increasingly clear: those with the fewest resources frequently bear the greatest cost.

Recent reporting from The Washington Post highlighted a troubling reality: as the Baby Boomer generation ages, the financial burden of caregiving is widening wealth disparities. Families with greater financial resources are generally better positioned to purchase care, access expert guidance, and preserve assets for future generations. Families with fewer resources are far more likely to shoulder caregiving responsibilities themselves, often sacrificing income, career advancement, and retirement savings in the process.

Aging as an Economic and Consumer Issue

For decades, aging has been treated as a private family challenge or, alternatively, as a healthcare issue. According to CareScout CEO Samir Shah, it is neither. Aging has become a consumer issue and an economic one.

America has constructed sophisticated systems to help individuals purchase homes, save for retirement, finance education, and invest for the future. Yet when a parent develops dementia, can no longer live independently, or suddenly requires care, millions of families are forced to navigate one of life's most complex transitions largely on their own. A key reason is that Medicare, the federal health insurance program for Americans 65 and older, generally does not cover long-term custodial care—the assistance with daily activities like bathing, dressing, and eating that many older adults eventually need.

According to CareScout's Cost of Care data, the median cost of assisted living now exceeds $74,000 annually, while a private room in a nursing home approaches $130,000 per year. Specialized settings such as memory care reach even higher.

Understanding those costs is difficult enough. Determining where to turn, what options exist, and how to coordinate care is often even harder. Families find themselves piecing together healthcare providers, home care agencies, senior living communities, legal advice, insurance benefits, financing options, and family responsibilities—all while under enormous emotional pressure. They are not failing, Shah argues; rather, they are being asked to navigate a fragmented system that was never designed to guide them through one of the most important chapters of life.

The Ripple Effects Across the Economy

The consequences extend well beyond individual households. The visible costs of aging are easy to identify: paying for home care, assisted living, transportation, medications, or home modifications. The invisible costs are often substantially larger.

Millions of family caregivers reduce work hours, delay promotions, leave the workforce entirely, or sacrifice retirement savings to care for aging parents. An AARP estimate placed the annual economic value of unpaid family caregiving at approximately $600 billion—a figure that underscores the scale of labor shifted onto relatives when formal systems are absent. Employers absorb lost productivity and increased absenteeism. Governments face mounting pressure on healthcare and social programs. Communities struggle to meet growing demand for services. These costs ripple throughout the economy.

The dynamic also helps explain why the financial burden of aging falls disproportionately on lower-wealth households. Families with financial means can often purchase expertise, coordination, and time. Families without those resources frequently provide those things themselves—paying instead with their income, careers, and future financial security.

The widening wealth gap, Shah contends, is therefore not simply the problem. It is one of the clearest symptoms of a much larger structural failure: America has not built the infrastructure required for an aging society.

A Call for Cross-Sector Action

As longevity increases and millions more Americans enter their later years, that infrastructure gap will become increasingly expensive—not just for families, but for employers, governments, and the broader economy.

Building that infrastructure will require action across sectors, Shah writes. Public policy, private innovation, employers, healthcare organizations, financial institutions, and entrepreneurs all have roles to play.

Most importantly, Shah argues, the country must stop treating aging as someone else's problem. Every American is a future consumer of the systems the nation builds—or fails to build.

"The generations that helped build this country deserve more than a fragmented maze of decisions during the final chapters of their lives," Shah writes. "And future generations deserve better than inheriting the same broken system."

The real question, he concludes, is not whether America can afford to build better infrastructure for aging. It is whether the country can afford not to.

---

Samir Shah leads CareScout's efforts to expand access to high-quality care and drive new solutions to the long-term care crisis. He has more than 20 years of experience spanning financial services, strategy, and digital transformation, including senior roles at JPMorgan Chase, McKinsey, and Goldman Sachs.

The opinions expressed in Fortune.com commentary pieces are solely the views of their authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions and beliefs of Fortune.

This story was originally featured on Fortune.com.