Aave Winds Down Underused Markets Across Six Chains to Reduce Risk Footprint
Key Takeaways
- •Aave will deprecate 50 low-adoption reserves and completely shut down markets on six blockchain networks that each generate under $5,000 in quarterly protocol revenue.
- •The affected assets total approximately $98.1 million in supplied funds and $15.6 million in outstanding debt, accounting for less than one percent of Aave's total deposits.
- •The decision follows a comprehensive review by LlamaRisk and aligns with Aave's newly formalized Risk Framework and Technical Asset Listing Framework.
- •Aave's phased shutdown process will freeze affected reserves, raise reserve factors to 99 percent, and set base borrowing rates at 5 percent to encourage users to exit voluntarily without forced liquidations.
- •The six retiring deployments experienced deposit declines ranging from 74 to 95 percent over the past six months, rendering them financially unsustainable to maintain.

Aave, a leading decentralized lending protocol that allows users to deposit crypto assets to earn yield or borrow against their holdings without a traditional intermediary, is phasing out support for underused digital asset reserves and winding down operations on several smaller blockchain networks. The initiative, led by founder Stani Kulechov, is designed to reduce the protocol's economic and technical risk exposure and aligns with Aave's newly formalized Risk Framework and Technical Asset Listing Framework. The move reflects a broader maturation of the decentralized finance sector, in which major protocols are increasingly adopting formalized risk policies reminiscent of traditional financial governance as total value locked grows into the tens of billions of dollars.
The changes affect approximately $98.1 million in supplied assets and $15.6 million in outstanding debt — less than one percent of Aave's total deposits, which currently stand in the mid-teens of billions of dollars. The protocol plans to redirect resources toward higher-impact markets and future priorities.
Strategic Risk Reduction
The decision to streamline operations follows a comprehensive review conducted by DeFi risk service provider LlamaRisk and other Aave service providers. The analysis identified numerous reserves and full deployments that no longer justify their ongoing operational costs. Each reserve requires continuous maintenance, including price oracles, risk parameter monitoring, and reliable liquidation mechanisms. For context, a single misconfigured oracle or stale price feed on even a small market can expose the protocol to exploitation, making long-tail assets disproportionately costly to secure relative to the revenue they generate.
Aave's new Risk Framework and Technical Asset Listing Framework provide the formal basis for these measures. The objective is to optimize the protocol's risk surface so it can operate more efficiently and securely while adapting to the evolving decentralized finance landscape.
Scope of Market Deprecations
The plan involves deprecating 50 low-adoption reserves spread across multiple Aave deployments. Aave will also orderly shut down entire markets on six blockchain networks: Sonic, Scroll, zkSync, Metis, Soneium, and Aptos. These six markets collectively account for an additional 25 reserves.
The protocol will additionally retire 21 matured Pendle Principal Tokens, replacing them with reserves linked to newer maturities to maintain relevance and yield generation for users. While the affected assets represent a small fraction of Aave's overall activity, they imposed an outsized operational burden.
Impacted Chains and Assets
The six full market closures were selected following sharp activity declines that left revenue well below support costs. Over the past six months:
- Deposits on Sonic fell approximately 74 percent to $7.6 million.
- Scroll's market dropped 86 percent to $2.2 million.
- zkSync declined 88 percent to roughly $844,000.
- Metis saw a 79 percent decrease to $297,000.
- Soneium plunged 95 percent to $173,000.
- Aptos holds approximately $1.7 million in supply, with liquidity down roughly 94 percent.
Each of these deployments now generates under $5,000 in quarterly protocol revenue, with some falling below $1,000 — insufficient to cover essential expenses such as oracle maintenance and risk monitoring.
Individual reserve removals target assets that have remained below usage thresholds, experienced steep deposit declines, or become redundant. These include bridged versions of tokens already available natively, such as USDC.e and USDbC. Larger affected positions include certain Bitcoin-wrapped assets and matured Pendle tokens on Plasma, totaling $32.2 million in supply.
Phased Implementation Process
Aave designed the implementation to be gradual, allowing users to exit positions without forced liquidations. Affected reserves will first be frozen, blocking new deposits, borrows, or collateral additions. Supply and borrow caps will be reduced to minimum levels.
On the six retiring deployments, reserve factors are expected to rise to 99 percent, directing nearly all interest to the protocol treasury. Base borrowing rates will be set at 5 percent. These measures are intended to incentivize suppliers to withdraw assets and borrowers to repay outstanding debt. Once exposure declines sufficiently, live price feeds will be replaced with fixed oracles, and the markets will be fully discontinued.
Kulechov emphasized that these actions do not represent a judgment on the underlying chains or layers themselves. Rather, they are a strategic move to reduce Aave's overall risk surface, enabling the protocol to concentrate resources on higher-impact markets and future innovations.
This focus comes as major financial institutions continue moving core operations onto blockchain networks, a broader trend of digital asset adoption that underscores the need for protocols like Aave to maintain efficient and secure infrastructure. The deprecation process itself may also serve as a reference point for other DeFi protocols evaluating their own multi-chain footprints, as the cost-benefit calculus of supporting low-activity deployments becomes a recurring consideration across the sector.
Sources: Crypto Briefing, Crowdfund Insider