NewsMacroUS 2-Year Treasury Yields Surge as Market Confronts Inflation Problem

US 2-Year Treasury Yields Surge as Market Confronts Inflation Problem

Author: Investinglive·

Key Takeaways

  • •US 2-year Treasury yields rose 19 basis points to 4.73% as investors reacted to a hot CPI report and comments from Fed Governor Chris Waller.
  • •Core CPI increased 0.3%, the level Waller said would keep a 50-basis-point December rate hike under consideration, and would have reached 0.4% without a 1.2% monthly decline in used auto prices.
  • •Whirlpool's decision to raise prices by 7% starting December 3 is viewed as an early signal that tariff-sensitive input costs are being passed through to consumers.
  • •Although oil prices have fallen, persistently wide refining product cracks are limiting energy downside, with no material improvement expected unless peace is reached in the Middle East and Ukraine.
  • •Secretary of State Marco Rubio described negotiations with Iran as not particularly productive, calling Iranian demands unacceptable while stating the economic campaign has removed the need for major combat operations.
US 2-Year Treasury Yields Surge as Market Confronts Inflation Problem

US 2-year Treasury yields surged 19 basis points to 4.73% as the market digested a hot CPI report and fresh comments from Federal Reserve Governor Chris Waller, according to an analysis published by Investinglive. The 2-year tenor is the point on the yield curve most sensitive to expectations for Federal Reserve policy over the next two years, which is why a repricing of the rate outlook lands there first and hardest.

Waller said a 50-basis-point rate hike was on the table for December if core CPI ran at +0.3% or higher. The core reading ultimately came in at 0.3% — and would have been +0.4% if not for a 1.2% monthly drop in used auto prices. Core CPI strips out volatile food and energy costs, which is why the Fed tends to treat it as the cleaner gauge of underlying price pressure. The Fed Governor also highlighted the widening breadth of price increases, something that was evident throughout the report.

Markets had grown less worried about inflation this month because oil prices have fallen, but the Fed's thinking is that inflationary expectations are starting to get built into 2027 price setting. The Investinglive report noted that this dynamic was flagged in late October, when Whirlpool said it would raise prices by 7% starting December 3. Whirlpool is one of the largest US home-appliance makers, a sector where steel and other tariff-sensitive inputs sit directly in the bill of materials — which is why the report treated its pricing decision as an early signal of how cost pass-through is setting in.

The Fed was wrong when it said tariff effects would move through the economy quickly, the author argued, and the consequences are now visible. Companies like Whirlpool saw margins collapse and tried to avoid price hikes. Consumers had also benchmarked their expectations on lower prices, and some income segments are certainly struggling, but vendors eventually realize they have to raise prices as costs for inputs like steel and other materials move through the supply chain. In the author's view, the Fed is getting that rude awakening now.

On energy, oil prices have come down, but product cracks remain absurdly wide, which limits the downside for now. Product cracks — the spread between what refiners pay for crude and what they earn on fuels such as gasoline and diesel — are a standard gauge of refining margins, and their width is the report's answer to the comfort markets have taken from falling headline oil. The report said there is no prospect of material improvement unless peace is reached in the Middle East and Ukraine. While there have been some positive steps recently, there is no sign a concluded deal on either front is imminent, and the author argued that risks lean toward sentiment worsening.

US Secretary of State Marco Rubio addressed the state of negotiations with Iran:

At the moment, the talks have not been particularly productive because the Iranian demands are simply unacceptable, and in some cases they are outrageous, ridiculous, and detached from reality... We're not going to pay. Iran, you know, is demanding reparations. They should be the ones paying reparations because they're the ones that have, you know, destabilized the region for long periods of time. They're demanding pallets of cash, which the president made clear is not going to happen. If they want a nuclear energy program, they should have one, like many other countries around the world have. So there's things they can do, but just right now they just don't seem, you know, at that point. Now I think they want a deal. There's no doubt they'd like a deal too, but they're just not ready to make one apparently. But we're open to a little bit changes. But I don't think status quo is the right way to phrase this. Status quo means that things are going to stay static. They're not. They're going to continue to grow. What I'm saying to you is that the economic campaign is so devastating that right now there really is no need for major combat operations. The president has basically said that over the last few days, and that's what I told our European allies today.

"That doesn't sound great," the author wrote. As the election dust settles, it is starting to look like nothing will change — an outcome the report described as problematic and inflationary. The author also argued that at some point markets will have to price in a Democratic sweep in 2028 and all the fiscal largess that would come with it, if Republicans do not force some kind of strategy change on Iran or tariffs.

The calendar ahead gives that thesis concrete checkpoints: the Whirlpool increase due from December 3, a December Fed decision where a 50-basis-point hike remains on the table, and Iran talks Rubio described as not particularly productive. Each offers a direct read on whether the inflation problem the report lays out deepens or eases.