交易員稱獲利觸發限制 LBank 遭爆100萬 USDT凍結爭議
重點速覽
- •韓國交易員@solyfw34指控LBank在其現貨帳戶中凍結約100萬枚USDT,此前他透過對XRP、DOGE、XLM、NEAR、FIL和SUI等大型加密貨幣的高槓桿期貨交易獲得可觀獲利。
- •根據該交易員的時間線,他的提款於9月19日受到限制,期貨交易於9月29日被封鎖,10月14日被告知異常資金不予釋放,導致其槓桿倉位在價格下跌時遭清算。
- •LBank否認僅因獲利而限制帳戶,表示交易與提款運作正常,並指出正與該用戶合作進行帳戶審查,同時已聘請外部法律顧問並警告將對虛假陳述採取法律行動。
- •該交易員表示,LBank未提供他多次要求的細節,包括哪些訂單被視為異常、哪些交易涉嫌構成市場操縱或適用了哪些服務條款條款,他計畫將此案上訴至包括Bithumb和DAXA在內的韓國組織。
- •區塊鏈調查員ZachXBT指控LBank讓其關鍵意見領袖以相同劇本引用其聲明,並將該交易所描述為認真交易者應避免使用的離岸平台。

加密貨幣交易所LBank正面臨與一名韓國交易員的公開爭議,後者指控該平台在其帳戶中凍結約100萬枚USDT(Tether發行的與美元掛鉤的穩定幣),並在他累積可觀獲利後限制其期貨交易。該交易所否認這種說法,表示帳戶絕不會僅因獲利而受到限制,且帳戶審查仍在進行中。這場衝突於2026年11月10日在X上公開爆發,並招致區塊鏈調查員ZachXBT的批評,他指控該交易所協調發布支持的影響者貼文。這場僵局觸及了中心化交易所用戶長期存在的摩擦點:平台服務條款通常賦予交易所審查和限制帳戶的廣泛裁量權,而質疑凍結的用戶通常只能看到交易所選擇揭露的資訊。
LBank否認基於獲利的限制
LBank在X上的一則貼文中回應相關指控,表示不會僅因用戶獲利就限制帳戶,交易與提款運作正常,並且正與該用戶直接溝通進行帳戶審查,同時保護其隱私。該交易所表示將對虛假指控進行自衛,已聘請外部法律顧問處理有關此事的虛假和誤導性陳述,並警告任何發布或散布虛假誹謗性陳述者可能面臨法律訴訟。它還呼籲報導此事的媒體和創作者查證事實並更正不實內容,並指出每天有近10萬名用戶在LBank交易期貨。
Let's clear this up 👇
We don't restrict accounts just because someone makes a profit.
Trading and withdrawals are running normally. We're working directly with the user on this account review and will share what we can while protecting their privacy.
If something isn't right, tell us. Ask questions, share your experience and hold us accountable. That conversation belongs here, including criticism.
We'll also defend ourselves against false claims. LBank has engaged external legal counsel to address false and misleading statements concerning this matter. The accompanying legal notice sets out our position.
Anyone who publishes or disseminates false and defamatory statements concerning this matter may face legal action. LBank will pursue appropriate legal remedies for any resulting damage to its reputation and legitimate interests.
To the media and creators covering this story: please check the facts before sharing, and correct anything inaccurate.
P.S. Nearly 100,000 of you trade futures on LBank every day. Let's hear from you 👀
— LBank.com (@LBank_Exchange) 2026年11月10日
交易員稱限制始於獲利的期貨交易之後
提出指控的用戶X帳號為@solyfw34,他表示衝突始於他對市值和交易量相對較高的大型加密貨幣(包括XRP、DOGE、XLM、NEAR、FIL和SUI)進行高槓桿期貨交易之後。高槓桿交易讓交易者能控制遠超其存入保證金規模的倉位,同時放大潛在收益與虧損。他在X上發布的詳細貼文中列出爭議時間線,並呼籲其他人在問題解決前避免使用該交易所:
🚨 LBank has frozen over $1M of my funds!
@LBank_Exchange @EH_LBank @xmuha0 @zachxbt @xiangzhang87 @ture_ath @Manjeet_LBank @Crypto__Haris
DO NOT USE THIS EXCHANGE
I made significant profits trading futures, and now my funds are frozen.
Here's what happened 👇
1️⃣ Aug 31: I started making significant profits through high-leverage futures trading, primarily on major altcoins with relatively high market caps and trading volumes, including XRP, DOGE, XLM, NEAR, FIL, and SUI.
2️⃣ Sep 19: While withdrawing some of my funds as usual, my withdrawals were suddenly restricted without warning.
LBank requested additional verification and identity checks, and I completed all the required procedures and waited for their response.
3️⃣ Sep 29: LBank restricted trading on my futures positions and demanded a much more detailed explanation from me.
4️⃣ Oct 14: After weeks of waiting, I received their final response:
"The relevant abnormal funds will not be released."
5️⃣ Current status: Since I was unable to close my futures positions due to the trading restrictions, they were eventually all liquidated as prices fell. Meanwhile, approximately 1M USDT remains frozen in my spot account.
I repeatedly asked LBank to explain:
- Which specific orders were considered abnormal?
- Which trades allegedly constituted market manipulation?
- Which accounts was I supposedly linked to?
- Exactly how much of my funds were classified as abnormal?
- Which specific clauses of their Terms of Service were being applied?
They have provided none of these details.
I was trading well-known assets such as NEAR, SUI, PEPE, BTC, FIL, LTC, SHIB, AVAX, ETH, and DOGE — not obscure, illiquid memecoins.
Yet my funds remain frozen without a clear explanation of what I allegedly did wrong.
Until this issue is resolved, I strongly urge everyone to reconsider using LBank.
If LBank continues to refuse to provide a transparent explanation or release my funds, I will continue raising awareness of this case within the Korean crypto community and bring it to the attention of relevant organizations, including Bithumb and DAXA.
I will keep pursuing this matter until I receive a fair resolution.
Users deserve transparency. Their funds should not be frozen without a clear and justified explanation.
@LBank_Exchange — I am still waiting for your response.
LBANK UID: LBA7H02780
For Korean (naver blog):
— dlrrwad.edge🦭 (@solyfw34) 2026年11月10日
根據時間線,9月19日該交易員照常提款時,提款首次在無預警的情況下受到限制。LBank要求額外的驗證和身分審查,他表示已完成所有要求的程序並等待回應。9月29日,其期貨倉位的交易也受到限制,他表示這導致他在價格下跌時無法平倉;倉位最終遭清算——即當保證金要求不再符合時對槓桿倉位的自動強制平倉。10月14日,在等待數週後,他表示收到了交易所的最終回覆:「相關異常資金將不予釋放。」據該交易員稱,約100萬枚USDT仍凍結在其現貨帳戶中。驗證要求和帳戶審查是中心化交易所的標準合規工具,交易所通常在服務條款中保留在審查期間限制帳戶的裁量權。
他表示曾多次要求LBank說明哪些訂單被視為異常、哪些交易涉嫌構成市場操縱、他被指與哪些帳戶有關聯、確切有多少資金被歸類為異常,以及適用了服務條款的哪些條款——但交易所未提供任何細節。他強調自己交易的是NEAR、SUI、PEPE、BTC、FIL、LTC、SHIB、AVAX、ETH和DOGE等知名資產,而非冷門、流動性差的迷因幣。
該交易員公開了他的LBank UID(LBA7H02780),並連結了Naver部落格平台上的韓文貼文以提供更多細節。他也質疑LBank對溝通過程的描述,表示在公開爭議之前,他已聯繫過帳戶經理、交易所客服及其法律團隊。他表示,如果LBank繼續拒絕提供透明解釋或釋放其資金,他將持續在韓國加密社群中提高對此案的關注,並將其提交給相關組織,包括韓國最大的加密貨幣交易所之一Bithumb,以及DAXA(數位資產交易所聯盟)——由該國主要交易平台組成、協調產業自律的聯盟。
ZachXBT批評LBank的公開辯護
區塊鏈調查員ZachXBT——以對加密產業駭客、詐騙和欺詐的鏈上調查聞名——也加入了討論,批評LBank聲明後出現的支持性回覆使用了幾乎相同的訊息。他指控該交易所讓其關鍵意見領袖(KOL)以相同劇本引用該貼文,並將LBank描述為認真交易者不應碰觸的離岸中心化交易所:
@LBank_Exchange At least make it less obvious having your KOLs quote the post with the same script.
LBank is just another offshore bucket shop CEX no serious trader should ever touch.
— ZachXBT (@zachxbt) 2026年11月10日
這場爭議仍未解決。該交易員堅稱其資金在缺乏明確合理解釋的情況下被凍結,而LBank表示問題正在審查中,並否認獲利交易本身觸發了限制。ZachXBT的批評加深了討論,但尚未對此案的核心問題給出明確答案。後續發展取決於LBank帳戶審查的結果,以及該交易員是否貫徹將此案提交韓國產業組織的計畫。