Trump Jr. es criticado por pedir a los fiscales generales estatales que se aparten del mercado por el que le pagan
Puntos clave
- •Donald Trump Jr. pidió a los fiscales generales estatales que relajaran la regulación de los prediction markets durante comentarios en Nueva Orleans a comienzos de marzo.
- •Sostuvo que los prediction markets ya están sujetos a una supervisión sólida y que deben tratarse como un instrumento financiero supervisado a nivel federal.
- •The New York Times dijo que sus comentarios coincidían con el mensaje del gobierno de Trump de que los estados se apartaran de los prediction markets.
- •Críticos en X dijeron que el planteamiento genera preocupaciones de conflicto de interés por los vínculos financieros de la familia Trump con el sector de los prediction markets.
- •Katherine Long, de The Wall Street Journal, dijo que casi todos los fiscales generales estatales ya han demandado a los prediction markets o han dicho que los estados tienen autoridad regulatoria sobre ellos.

Donald Trump Jr., el hijo mayor del presidente Donald Trump, está haciendo un planteamiento legal destinado a despejar el camino para la participación de la familia Trump en las apuestas por internet y los prediction markets, y la medida está generando fuertes reacciones en X.
A comienzos de marzo, según el abogado Daniel Wallach, el hijo menor de Trump sugirió que los fiscales generales estatales deberían relajar la regulación de los prediction markets. Wallach señaló que Don Jr. "made a pitch to a crowd of Republican state attorneys general who had gathered for a three-day retreat at the Ritz-Carlton hotel in New Orleans."
The New York Times informó: "Sitting onstage for a question-and-answer session with Montana's attorney general, Mr. Trump suggested that state leaders were being led astray by a 'vested interest' — gambling firms that wanted to protect their 'monopolies' by attacking prediction markets, four people familiar with his remarks said. In reality, he said, the markets already had robust oversight, describing them as a sophisticated financial tool overseen by federal officials, not state attorneys general."
The Times describió el tono de Don Jr. como "friendly", pero dijo que sus comentarios "dovetailed with a message" del gobierno del presidente Trump para "back off" prediction markets. The comments also land in an environment where state regulators have been asserting their own authority over the sector, setting up a continuing tension between federal oversight arguments and state-level gambling enforcement.
According to Wallach, Don Jr., "the president's eldest son, has repeatedly promised to keep his family's business interests separate from the work of the administration."
Other X users, however, are arguing that Don Jr.'s call for state attorneys general to "lay off" prediction markets amounts to a major conflict of interest for the second Trump administration.
More Perfect Union wrote on X: "The President's son is paid by Kalshi and Polymarket, and he's telling elected officials not to go after these companies."
RWC CEO Daniel Reinert tweeted: "family grift is CRAZY LARGE."
Katherine Long of The Wall Street Journal noted: "Though Don Jr. told the AGs to back off prediction markets, they appear not to have listened. Nearly all state attorneys general have now sued prediction markets or said publicly that states have regulatory authority over them."
Zubiqo pointed out: "The Trump family holds a financial stake in the prediction market sector. Federal preemption arguments won't stop state AGs when local gambling tax revenue is on the line."
Wade of Red Desk wrote: "Whether prediction markets deserve federal financial oversight instead of a state gambling patchwork is a fair question — but having the President's business-partner son personally lobby AGs to drop it is a bad way to make that case."