President Donald Trump has shifted blame for rising oil prices onto major oil companies rather than his administration's war against Iran — and the editorial board of The Washington Post, owned by billionaire Jeff Bezos, is pushing back forcefully.

In an editorial published Wednesday, the Washington Post Editorial Board framed Trump's stance as economically illiterate.

"Prices are set by supply and demand," the board wrote. "That economic law is as fundamental as they come, but not for the first time, President Donald Trump is acting like he's above the law."

The editorial highlighted Trump's recent criticism of energy giants Chevron and ExxonMobil, which both reported record-breaking quarterly profits amid the Iran conflict. Chevron posted a quarterly record of $12.1 billion, while ExxonMobil's $14.5 billion nearly doubled its second-quarter profit from the previous year. The dynamic — integrated oil majors posting windfall earnings during a supply-driven price shock — has historically drawn political scrutiny, as companies benefit from the same geopolitical disruptions that squeeze consumers at the pump.

Trump had stated that oil companies are "making too much money based on a shortage" and that "they ought to give some of that back to the public, and they better cut the retail price." The Post countered that Trump's invasion of Iran prompted the country to largely shut down the Strait of Hormuz — the primary driver of surging oil prices.

"The Strait of Hormuz, which accounts for 20 percent of the world's oil trade, remains largely shut down, driving up the global price," the Post wrote. "The president might have considered this obvious consequence before he attacked Iran in February and failed to quickly establish American control over the strait."

The editorial was direct in assigning responsibility: "Prices at the pump being roughly $1 higher today per gallon than they were a year ago is the result of decisions made in Washington, not by the oil majors."

The board also noted that Trump's tariffs have contributed to rising prices before concluding that the president should redirect his blame toward his own administration.

"A vital lesson from the war in Iran is that America needs an abundant supply of every form of energy the market can produce," the Post wrote. "Gas prices would be much higher right now, for example, if progressives had managed to ban fracking a few years ago."

The board's closing recommendation: "If the president really wants to bring down prices, he should focus on expanding the supply of oil at home and abroad."

Notably, Trump himself appeared to implicitly acknowledge at a Las Vegas rally on Wednesday that his war is the primary cause of rising gas prices.

"When oil goes down, and it's going to go down very rapidly and is already happening, we may have to send it up again, we may have to — you know what happens when we send it up," Trump told the audience. "But we don't have to. But when that oil and gasoline go down, everything else follows. But we have done a great job at reducing prices and we have done an unbelievable job in making our country really, really respected and successful again."

In an interview with AlterNet in June, Dr. Robert Shapiro — a top economic adviser to President Bill Clinton — confirmed that Trump's war against Iran has driven oil prices higher and warned that the problem is unlikely to be resolved even if the conflict ends swiftly.

"Even if hostilities do not restart, the price of oil will not return to pre-Trump levels because there's a new risk premium that they could restart at any time, increasing tanker insurance costs for example, and because oil infrastructure has been degraded, reducing supply for some time," Shapiro explained. "An Iran-controlled toll to use the Strait will produce big bucks for Iran, but its impact on world prices for oil, natural gas, helium, etc. should be minimal. Another source of economic friction will be the now-intense uncertainty about what the Trump administration will do next — in the Mideast and in scores of policies at home; and uncertainty dampens investment."

Shapiro concluded: "As it is, the economy was weakening before this crisis began, and these and other factors will exacerbate those downward pressures. A resolution over the next two weeks will not stop the deterioration in economic conditions."

White House spokeswoman Taylor Rogers responded to these criticisms by telling AlterNet that "the United States' energy dominance status, as the world's leading producer and a top exporter of oil and natural gas, has positioned us to not rely on the free flow of oil through the Strait of Hormuz like other countries. If anything, Operation Epic Fury actually underscored the importance of producing reliable, affordable, and secure energy here at home. Many of our allies that have tried transitioning to intermittent and unreliable renewable energy sources have predictably failed to break their reliance on foreign oil that goes through the Strait."

Rogers added: "Several countries from around the world are now looking to emulate the President's energy dominance agenda and are advancing new partnerships that enhance their energy security with the United States."