UBS: Venezuela Oil Deal Strategically Significant but Unlikely to Move Crude Prices; Strait of Hormuz Remains Key Driver
Key Takeaways
- •UBS believes developments around the Strait of Hormuz, rather than the Venezuela deal, remain the main driver of near-term oil prices.
- •The 25-year US-Venezuela agreement covers 17 oil fields with over 65 billion barrels of proven reserves and targets production above 1.5 million barrels per day with more than $100 billion in private investment.
- •Venezuela currently produces about 1.12 million barrels per day, and UBS says rebuilding capacity from that low base requires major investment, technical expertise, and a stable operating environment.
- •No formal agreement, decree, or contract has been published yet, leaving the deal's legal and political durability uncertain, including possible challenges and questions about US congressional approval.
- •UBS forecasts Brent crude at roughly $85 per barrel by December 2026, holds a Neutral view on US energy equities, and prefers selective exposure to oilfield services.

UBS analysts say the US-Venezuela oil agreement announced last week is strategically significant but unlikely to meaningfully move crude prices in the near term, arguing that developments around the Strait of Hormuz remain the dominant force setting the oil market's direction, according to a note from the bank.
President Trump announced the agreement late last Friday, granting US companies a major role in developing 17 Venezuelan oil fields containing more than 65 billion barrels of proven reserves. Venezuela's interim President Delcy Rodríguez said the 25-year agreement targets production of more than 1.5 million barrels per day and would require over 100 billion US dollars of private sector investment, while stressing it would preserve Venezuelan ownership and sovereignty over Venezuelan resources. Trump has also indicated that future Venezuelan output could help replenish the US Strategic Petroleum Reserve, currently at a 44-year low, though UBS notes the practical mechanism for doing so remains unclear given differences in crude quality and storage requirements between the two countries' oil.
The bank's core message is one of expectation management: the Venezuela deal grabs headlines, but Hormuz remains the variable actually setting the marginal price of oil, given that roughly a fifth of global oil trade historically passed through the strait and UBS sees scope for further escalation as US sanctions pressure builds. That framing argues against reading the Venezuela announcement as a bearish supply signal for crude in the near term, since UBS's own numbers show Venezuelan output has risen only 100,000 to 200,000 barrels a day this year despite the country holding the world's largest proven reserves.
Three reasons the near-term impact will be limited
UBS argues the deal's near-term market impact will be limited for several reasons.
First, Hormuz disruption continues to dominate price action. Roughly a fifth of global oil trade passed through the strait before the current conflict, making any threat to those flows immediately consequential for prices regardless of longer-term supply developments elsewhere. The bank also flagged that an expanding US Treasury sanctions campaign against Iran, which has already targeted one bank and is expected to widen in coming weeks, carries its own risk of prompting renewed Iranian retaliation against Gulf energy infrastructure and shipping. Brent crude rose more than 2% on Monday after US forces struck two Iranian rocket launchers on Larak Island, with Iran's Revolutionary Guards retaliating against US forces in Jordan, underscoring how directly Gulf developments continue to drive price swings.
Second, Venezuela faces a major operational challenge. The country currently produces roughly 1.12 million barrels a day despite holding the world's largest proven reserves, a gap the bank attributes to years of underinvestment, sanctions, infrastructure deterioration and power shortages. That output level is far below the roughly 3 million barrels a day Venezuela produced in the late 1990s before its long decline, underscoring the distance between current capacity and the deal's target. Output has risen only 100,000 to 200,000 barrels a day since the start of the year, which UBS says illustrates how difficult it will be to rebuild capacity from such a low base, requiring large-scale investment, technical expertise, new transport infrastructure and a stable operating environment before any material production increase materialises.
Third, the deal's legal and political durability is uncertain. No formal agreement, decree or contract has yet been published, and it remains unclear how the arrangement fits within Venezuelan law or how future governments in either country might treat it. UBS suggests the deal could be structured to avoid the need for US congressional approval, a consideration that may matter more if Democrats regain control of either chamber in November's midterm elections, and cautions that legal challenges cannot be ruled out. The bank said the scale of private investment the deal ultimately attracts will likely track closely with how stable that legal and political framework proves to be, adding that a useful near-term signal will be how much capital the Venezuelan opportunity draws relative to competing projects elsewhere in the Americas that carry lower political and execution risk.
Outlook
Taken together, UBS said it expects little immediate impact on crude oil or US gasoline prices from the Venezuela announcement, with the US-Iran conflict, shipping levels through the Strait of Hormuz, and the broader trajectory of global energy demand remaining the key drivers to watch.
The bank forecasts Brent crude at around 85 US dollars a barrel by December 2026, with upside risk in the near term should the US-Iran conflict re-escalate further, and said it continues to see value in broad commodity exposure as both a potential source of returns and a portfolio diversifier during periods of geopolitical stress and inflation uncertainty.
On equities, UBS maintains a Neutral view on the US energy sector following its strong year-to-date performance driven by crude and refining gains, and favours selective exposure to oilfield services over broader sector exposure, which it expects to benefit from rising international spending over the next several years.