Asia's energy security hinges on the Strait of Hormuz, a critical waterway the region does not control. The passageway carries a substantial share of the crude oil and liquefied natural gas that fuels power generation across Japan, South Korea, India, and Southeast Asia. Any disruption from renewed conflict there would send shockwaves far beyond fuel prices, threatening the power infrastructure underpinning the region's technology goals.

If Asia fails to build deeper, more liquid electricity networks, it risks ceding its position in the global AI value chain. Nearly every major Asian economy has now adopted a formal national AI masterplan. Japan recently unveiled a 370 trillion yen ($2.3 trillion) national budget, with more than a quarter of that sum earmarked for artificial intelligence and semiconductor spending over the next 15 years.

Training frontier AI models concentrates enormous computing power into a handful of locations, while inferencing demands low-latency facilities in dense urban hubs. Data center power demand across Asia-Pacific is projected to surge by an estimated 165% between 2023 and 2030.

However, much of the region's headline megawatt figures amount to what industry insiders call "bragawatts"—announcements that look impressive on paper but are far slower to materialize as real, deliverable energy.

Despite rapid progress in renewable energy generation, reliable systems require substantial grid upgrades. Renewables are typically built far from demand centers and generate power intermittently. Without new transmission and storage infrastructure, server racks will struggle to operate at full capacity. According to the International Energy Agency's Southeast Asia Outlook, grid and storage investment in 2025 reached just $13 billion—far below the $50 billion needed annually through 2050.

In an era of elevated fuel prices and energy insecurity, competing priorities may also supersede electricity supply for data centers. Politicians and policymakers prioritize keeping residential lights and air-conditioning running.

The United States offers a cautionary tale. Up to half of all planned U.S. data center projects may fail to come online this year. In the first three months of 2026, 75 data center projects worth a combined $130 billion were blocked or delayed by local opposition, matching the total number blocked in all of 2025. Federal incentives under the CHIPS and Science Act and the Inflation Reduction Act have accelerated U.S. semiconductor and energy infrastructure spending, widening the competitive gap with Asian markets still working through grid bottlenecks.

Asia is already experiencing a similar shortfall. The region delivered only about 38% of its announced data center capacity in 2024, representing one of the widest plan-to-delivery gaps of any market globally, according to a white paper produced with Oxford's Smith School. The problem is especially acute in Malaysia and India—two countries banking heavily on a digital infrastructure boom.

Johor has banned the construction of Tier 1 and 2 data center facilities over concerns about strain on local water infrastructure. Meanwhile, India's ambitions to double its projected capacity by the end of the next financial year will have to contend with severe grid delivery lags.

With AI-driven euphoria flooding markets, the gap between what is promised and what is feasible is poised to widen further. Commodity markets are already pricing in the announced build-out rather than what is realistically executable. Copper prices have remained high on assumptions of surging data center construction demand, and transformer costs are running at two to three times pre-2020 levels as developers rush to lock in scarce equipment.

If interconnection queues stretch the way they have in the U.S. and Europe, the mismatch between announced and delivered capacity could trigger the kind of boom-bust cycle that metals markets experienced in the last decade.

Singapore, Malaysia, and South Korea are responding with regulatory frameworks requiring data center developers to submit plans for battery storage, curtailment management, and grid-impact assessments. Singapore previously imposed a temporary moratorium on new data center construction between 2022 and 2023 before introducing a conditional allocation system, illustrating how quickly resource constraints can tighten even in well-capitalized markets.

This means Asia's AI build-out may decelerate even as the United States presses ahead with a further $4 trillion in planned data center construction through 2028. Every quarter that Asian operators wait represents another quarter of compute, talent, and capital that could be deployed elsewhere.

A more liberal approach to distributed energy generation and electricity trading—essentially opening wholesale electricity markets to price competition—would help attract investment and reduce the region's dependence on imported oil and gas. Achieving this, however, requires deeper, more transparent energy markets.

Currently, the region's electricity markets do not provide investors with the transparency they need. Most Asian electricity systems still rely on a traditional model: vertically integrated, state-owned utilities acting as single buyers, with retail tariffs set administratively and limited third-party trading permitted. This restricts the formation of future pricing signals through forward contracts. Investors in mature markets such as Europe and the United States take such trading layers for granted. China, by contrast, has pursued a state-directed model for AI infrastructure with centrally allocated power resources, placing it largely outside the competitive landscape shaped by market-based electricity pricing that other Asian economies must navigate.

Renewable energy investors in Asia face greater uncertainty over long-dated returns, which are more exposed to government intervention during demand surges. This elevates the risk that grid projects stall for lack of investment—the very same grid infrastructure that Asia's data centers are waiting to connect to.

Some liberalization efforts are already underway. Japan's power futures market is the fastest-growing electricity derivatives market globally. India's power exchange IEX now operates day-ahead and term-ahead markets. Meanwhile, electricity has been flowing and traded commercially from Laos through Thailand and Malaysia to Singapore since 2022, under a landmark multilateral power trade arrangement.

Marex has been contributing to growing liquidity in Japan's power derivatives markets. In New Zealand, Marex was recently selected to provide an over-the-counter (OTC) trading platform supporting the country's standardized super-peak electricity contract—deepening a local market that, like many across Asia, has traditionally been fragmented and thinly traded.

These developments illustrate what deeper Asian power markets could look like: instruments and platforms enabling generators, industrial users, and investors to hedge and price electricity with the same confidence they bring to other commodities.

Electricity in Asia needs to trade with the same rigor as crude oil does in global markets. Delivering the AI build-out the region aspires to will ultimately require power markets that are sufficiently robust—and transparent—to give capital the confidence to build ahead of demand, not behind it.

The opinions expressed in Fortune.com commentary pieces are solely the views of their authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions and beliefs of Fortune.

This story was originally featured on Fortune.com.